768 THE GARDENERS CHRONICLE. (Nov. 12. 
ven of it is in a letter from | had proceeded o1 on to Manchester. Upon all these grounds the | their inquiry to e previous conduct and opinions of nad bail, 
the Beagle, and the account gi learned counsel hoped that the writ would be granted, and that | He ae dastice Patteson) eens a case in which one of 
s had refused to accept a person as bail teeneal 
t 
River Inquirer. The jphabitants were stated to be neither ete immediately, as the authoriti aa iestendied to hier pt Captain Hee So the nanper of a gaming- Soni bot although it h 
b 
een pened decided that such a ground of objection was 
one of the officers aboard, and which appears sin the Swan to meet-the emergencies of the case, it would he made return- ie 
ublesome. The temperature yaried from uglas from the} prison in which he was now confine say coped 
ee oe indy his was in the mid-winter month of Mr. ustice Patteson granted the applic cation.— In ourt of | not suffici nt, it was not pretended that the case was one — 
52 to 82; and as t tevel of th ci coast Queen’s Bench on Thursday, the Attorney- “Gusieeel snewtivesed this d 
July, forty feet shove the level of the sea, i is easy to S€€ | case, in reference to the habeas corpus, and stated that Capt. | some further remarks from counsel, Mr. Justice Patteson deattnd 
that the summer heat would be oppressive to Europea Douglas was now in Military custody. He understood that his | that th affidavits might be handed up to him, and said that he 
constitutions. Nothing else, however, could be ath Learned Friend who appeared for the Captain ~—— ban and = read oe oe iden e 5a) gave his judg a j e. 
wishe on | sent he top inclined to a soa that ought not to grant arule, 
in the P arallel of erg degrees. The who % cur, t cipee _ t day. Mr. Chambers said that he understood both. sides | The ca ame on Thursday, when his Lordship 
he immense island or continent, rom t nega es Car- | w ted time. His object i present to the Court | said that ‘siex a eaek come at of the affidavits he had come to 
pentaria on the north, is 908 miles, of which 300 miles the. ‘depobticas on which the captain had been committed, an | the conclusion not only that the ansendarts ~ acted wrongly 
have been explored northward from Adelaide by Mr. Eyre. wn ese were not ready now. It was quidersenod that the Learnel | in refusing to admit the persons —_ had been proposed as bail 
The ‘‘ Albert” admits of an nearly a hu * ndred miles ‘éunsel should have ag to bring up the depositions. The ie for O'Neill, but that the manner in which that. —— — been 
Bs . & y hearing of the case was then postponed. Mr. Chambers then | stated by them, the expressions hey had u the time, and 
in a direction to the south, so that there remain sti ill | aid that the captain was soar in military custody ; and he asked | the observation, that they had other their refusal, bat 
about five hundred to airs ‘ourt, as such custody p revented his legal a from hay- | which they had refused to state, all together established a case 
ng free a to him, to order the custody to be changed. | which justified the Court in grantingarulecalling upon them to 
Lord Denman said the Court could not seetene in that matter | explain their conduct. The rule, however, would only be granted 
at ™ Buindrid " me = against the two magistrates, Messrs. Eanes r and aed a 9, for 
a ynidee whe Booth.—The defendant in this e had see although the committal was the act of five magistrates, and the 
Bo cg chy Rage oN tg Sree ive wich Flagg Pa pw to give a cup, of the value of fifty guineas, to be run for at | warrant was signed by them all; it did not appear that the other 
the last assizes for Surrey, before Lord Abinger, when a verdict the pote Bedford r races upon certain conditions. igs plaintiff in | three had been at all implicated in the refus al complained of. 
was found for the plaintiff. The pleas put ra were pl ju the action: all eged i in his. declaration that he had c mpli ee Me vet Rule —- accordingly. 
in, e r-General now moved for a nonsuit or a Consitstory Court.—Pemberton Pemberton.—In the last 
new trial. The declaration stated, that there was a race at Epsom the defendant refused to give it. The defendant pleaded several term, the Svanhe r for “Mrs. Pemberton ‘that lady having obtain 
called the Derby, whic as run for in the present year, and for pleas, amongst which was one alleging that the ema wast differ- | previously ron Seo lene and had alimony granted to her) stated 
in 's amounting to the sum of 9,100/. ; that certain horses ence had been referred by the o per- | that Mr. Pemberton yank. on tite the sible payment, 
named A and Robert de Gorham, and others, yan atthe race: sons to be name ed by the Dake of Bedford ; that his Orage had | deducted the income-tax The court then sai id i wou Id take 
a that A AE 398 e viene: that a horse named: Claw: ors nominated Colonel Anson and Mr. G. Pa ayne to decide the con- d 
troversy ; and that they had a given judgment in favour of the de- expressed his opinion, aoe having carefully referred to the 
fendant. The plaintiff in his replication icubet this gages that the deduction must be allowed, the lady having the power 
Cc 
D 
tered was enti ied te . cals of the ‘teat Unter Cauddlen wee of referees, and the case was afterwards referred to rom- | of applying to 7 rnp gh 8 are eturn of the tax if her whole in- 
entered he was purchased by the p aintiff, who intended: him to melin and Lord C. Russell, of whom the former dendieina was | come was under 150/. a 
run, but shortl ¢ the ne race e was discov ered to | be lame nominatéd by the plaintiff and the latter by the defendant. These = 
, taorelers ithe nd the: > | arbitrators were empowered, in the event of their not being able SPORTING. 
the plaintiff was a menities "of the Jockey Club, and that one of the nae me the re a ete i pel ery —The | ft was too dull 
— that club was, t = ifap ng betted oe “ horse and appointed the sce, P Captad n Rous for this purpose.. The nik 2 DE Le ie Bets actually 1atg. 
a! w , SU rse was considered to have : 
lost, and the bets in his ‘avout bang paid to those persons who function : ngh ad sete having g entered upon the B cob maga a Neg sto Jagst = Blakelock’s ‘A British Yeoman 
had betted against him. The d libel was then cubstentily ’ -” lc 0S - Byles, | 1400 to.100 — Sir G. Heathcote’s lot (taken) 
stated in the de claration, by which, it was represented t m the part of the defendant, now applied to the court) i090 to 45 — Mr Bell’s Winesour (taken 
laintiff, before purchasing Canadian, had betted largely porate for a rule jailing, span 3° plaintiff (0. show cause wDy | | -1060,t0..35.-— Dake of Cision s Qayeen colt (taken twice) . 
= and withdrew arti ‘after the purchs e nd of | the — s ue Ste be set. ogee Sauer 3 the — an “of 1000 to« 20 — Mr. R. Wood's Eli (taken 
eness—‘‘a lame excu ne being better than none.” The allege mea anid Span ie. umpue Ss con _ in ‘the matter © 400 to 10 — Mr. Bowes’s Cotherstone (taken) 
Ld rn proceeded to ask uestions, which it declared oe enenh 400 to 10 — Sir G, Heathcote’s Amorino (taken) 
unless ¢ ene al Hse aban were satisfactory, that | ‘ uced some affidavits, C7 which one was made by Mr. Booth ana 400 to 10 — Sir G. Heathcote’s Sirikol (taken) 
bi a as a ro’ and would be an everlasting stain another by Lord Charles fase The general re esult of these ; , 
on the chara ee Phy - those engaged in it. The learned rom Teton statements was, Me at the time appointed for the hearing of the MARK LANE, Fripay, Nov. has been but 
Serres chew Cutaemee eT wedstiiict Conse oF section was | Sue betore’the wiapine. She Thee red tO who was a material | small arrival of English Wheat since Monday, and that day’s cur. 
shown on, the declaration, “The facts of the plant's Betine | Tne dfendant in these cicamataere requested ah adjournment fey an ly supricd-_Forlg, wast te ae a 
drawing him, were not. denied: but — to the lameness, of yd wey rar his -_ Steer ae pee an i ve om ming oe some inquiry for bonded for age melgeg Fine ay is in de- 
evidence was d as to the fact of the case having been originally referred to the | mand, but secondary qualities are a heavy sale as are im- 
question was, ioe ae ae PR comers? Myr Seed H pee pee who had been ——, by the Duke. Jt wasrepre- | proving in value. Beans are (eqns = sale, unless ata reduc- 
the de the plaintiff could ly. main he t this evidence was nds spensable to the | tion. ‘The Ost Tirade is exeesdingly & 
e x paar seaiuoh the aeetit erly eae case of ‘the defendant, in rela rn to the plea phew: 3 mentioned, , PER IMPERIAL vannan. 8 5 
able conduct and upon which issue had been joined. The umpire, however, Wheat, Roses, ‘Rent, an Suffolk White 44 to - Red 40to 
pubs pent os to ve , and not with respect to the race, for | refused to adjourn the hearin He said that het was no use at Norfolk, Lincolnshire and Yorkshi re —to— White —to— 
bape one ne Aye the owner of a horse might withdraw | 4) in referring the matter to him if he was to be influenced by | B® Barley « a Ma 3 and distilling 26. ye Grind: £€ 
of ae ee time bef race, without being considered guilty | any opinion which the original pebltantor might have expressed Ont states wf ie ‘Gen "Tied vise Pcewue wa 
wed d the astonishment of nine soot ea ed cert or entertained upon the. subject. He said sige pe hadin his own | —— Ir * sae sa he ee + + Feed “a0 0 18 _ Potato 14 to 28 
ft oo as stated at She tones t it was the rule, SD Ber wierd bd ihe princigies Biase, 3 old and new . 24 to a “Tick gto 81 Haiiow 31 10 2 
nouak ti the eons bes as nen ale —— — ot: + he —— He ape Seeeen te to make an a oe in esaaut of Peas, Het tigdand ry See Winds. rsd me Grey 28 toa 
le to act upon it, and pon that vrbabe oi learned judge bo evidene yey wap beep aoe org as st he eget to athens veiw Basler AVERAGES. “ x 
had received evidence which ought not to have been admitted. evidence which fenda ere ag bien é eS eer et ie et ae Beans. yet 
But some of the evidence was e; still, tricaettian | Ce ees Ure des ‘atteson gr the rale. ee Mest eli wishes ¢ ee 
itself gal, any imputation upon aper n con- | nq I ation.—The Queen v. Thomas Badger EtG-5 | + «Sl m1 e8to|: 18 0) 3 7) ee 
uct in the course of such transaction could not be the ground of tate ee H. bt Sx —Mr. Erle APP ied ‘for a =— 2 = 34 B~ * 1B 5 a1 7 a2 2 |. a8 7 
The + 04 tot: pete Sopp ony 8 William Cartwright ian imiagistrates of the coun vs of St ee  . . & 28 7 &| 2910| stil} 34 & 
: ea e 5 “ RESETS ane ee eee - 
Beta dass rae espa oan Crop tad | SO eae ean cerane metren re: | Oo eres Art Beet BLS eh Beem 
point was shown in the-case of “‘Shillitow.Teague.” ‘The Court | fused to admit to bail the Rev. A. O'Neill, © dissenting preacher, Duties | “ao! 0 i sae. e| 10. |S 
as ‘ ne sh oe geo cence the ras whe was brought before them, charged with having Dtended an an : se ; oe ig Tat oa fs ee 
. 4 i . te e, | Dns. kd 
withdrawn. The Solic itor. General said that Colonel Peel was cence, msel{in 001 ,andewo surticsin 10. Foner es eo ae ska rs Bris. ra whe 2 366 685 | 73 1045 | 18 
a on the trans, god state thet Be mae ee P lant had a joint | to sive 24 hours’ notice of bail, andin the mean time to stand com- : | 1660} 530" 
In pe peony f Mo re a He bad ont ridge vy ee iia tat mitted. The learned counsel ‘stated, that from the affidavits on x aoe ol a ws Pitt 3 : 
lander, it ta od 5 which he founded his motion, it appeared that after Mr. O’Neill Wheat _ Barley Oats _ Flour 
Bandit. § dee stated, pas had pepe, aren Sat the the bri ds | had been so committed in default of bail, Mr. Collins, his attorney, Trish - 1860 abe ieed oles 
J i a ere i a Leer’ al 
find, he cares of Hunt Beit "and 2 Smart, Clement | othe aa and gave tem ile were the presiding magistrates | Foreigs «<a = 
suit, on ‘the ground of the “egalit of the tran vThe ‘or Mr. O’Neili two persons of the name of Page and Truman, OF, THE 
Solicitor General 3 dection. © | both of whom were members of the town council of Birmingham INSOLVENTS.—B. La , Old Broad- street tt merchan T. Mur- 
elope then applied for a rule for a new trial, on the z } | ray, Bedford-street, Geeent ‘Garden; lass-dealer— Oo Heron rter- 
= a situation _—_ no person was to fill unless possessed if : id ~ Pearce 
ground that the learned judge permitted a question to be put to | , prope San tas aoe of 1 asat There could Nubrere eg merchant-—T. W. Prosser, Hereford, sada-w: . ater septate: mE ET 
ee » Wan Se See in fact matter of | no doubt of tne responsibility of the parties so tendered and their Sean RUeNC as pre RSEDED.G. sion hy setae te draper—A.-W- 
consideration for the jury. The question was, whether the wit- | possession of pro es to Toor aiderwiils than he uencant of | ©: > alge Sea eee evandie and G. Field, Marylebone, 
ov did not think it dishonourable for a party to withdraw a P Lit i s, the defendants 1 refused bo ss abbegh that coachmaters. ii Cit 
oz Ww treet, . 
ei ey arreret terre, ~_ ey ——— — ree on oe ground th _ agree were connected with the Chartists, Pea ate But a Lodge, enme raeet 8 Behe, bath proprietor. 5 Mare Tr 
_ Common PiEas.—Smith v. ecolictings ee was an action to A long conversation on the subject “took place between Mr. Col- | shall, Wood-streety Cheapside, warehouzemen—J. Lindon, Plymouth, mesr 
recover the sum of 50/. upon a promissory note made | by the de. _ =F tre defendan s, and of which the learned counsel | sheat—J. 0. Burnley and J- Autys, Heckmon ndwike, Yorkshire, corm: miter 
t as a member of the Westminster Loan Investment Com- | read a pene has sieoy a in the public prints. | 3; M. Frances, Goa Soa tay Ce obdtngs s00 se a nomen 
rote the = fae te. Adam street, Alcs, sat Oe Mr. Badger, the urse rn conversation, told Mr. & ranbrook, Deal, Ke nt, dre aper— J, Froste and I. Ashlin, Liv verpoo}, merchants 
e plaintiff for that company. It appeared by the | Collins that the application me mit O’Neill to.pbail came Anderson, Manchester, printer—E. B . Robinson, Nowinghaats printel 
wenence tie at ym = me ant became a shareholder of the West- | through a suspicious channel, ‘he “alin being then him- <i. "Lindon, Soapet,, Darema le: corn-factor— 1 = ufacurer of a 
minster Loan t Conspisry. in July 1841, and that he | self under recognisances artist meeting, | 274 ee aoe taineiel a. Jauec’, bookbinder— R. J.Webb 
sociation down to the period of and added that he had ow ae oe i rsons whose | dilly, tailor— G. T. Knowles, Manchester, cotton-spinner—H Char! non, Rexeat 
ata ‘that in consequence of ce names bad been handed to the bench were willing to become bail | 4«tt Sig sagt St. — si wo bu uilder—6..J- M rshall and 
y The Times newspaper, and an exposure | for O’Neill. However, notwithstanding these remarks, Mr. cod street, Cheapside, worttiaon, Watteman, Dumfries shiney | | 
the oa te who had ie deposits withdrew | Collins Le hey required notice of 24 hours of his intention to Ra cae 4 Walken sgt Ha sey 3 pine rh beam 5 
y eho “roa Saye Capt. oe pert — the a ies, — vir ee Truman, as bail for RAS EES a sales ‘eis = 
; mpany to the amount | O?Neill sua 8 fs the expira’ of the ours he attended with th — Grosvenor 
ph oe a = action to fix the defendant, | them. before the pb catery in order that they might enter into Hillsborough, of = see bn ther sapone a are. eaucet ae LT 
of one of — ba the seaniiee recognisances. On this oc ceasion another long con- | Clay 5: Esa » M.P., of a son—In Bedford-square, on the 6th i instant the 
: abe i sg 2 om ton versati ron —— Mr. Collins — me a se lady of He mre or ross = Hag. > of Ee aa ee and "Soot is on 
Sin spson, ‘ secretary, | proved at | learn prec sel ead a rt of nst., in Cumberlan street, t e Jady © aptain ington, 
endorse bills of exchange in the name of | course of which the wiefendant t Badger said as mast take Gmes to Guards, of stn donenenente it, Site Dryham-park, Barnet, the Heap 
coven greg In his examination by counsel, the | consider before he ae ae the proffered bail should be MARRIAC ES-—On the t., at Tynan Church, cougt my a 
Sad attend ea “the “some oe ea by stating that he | accepted ornot. In the time he would put a few questions _ BS te Soe taxes Brtmatey Capiain,  tovoa eee a are Has vlings 
i n ’ , a » 
and that niger mame - Laurie at Guildhall, | to the proposed bail. He ethan asked Mr. Page whether he had | oo oond daughter of Sir James M. cnet Bart., of ery 8 Abbe 
‘More dbdamentary evildnce Was Aiteced begga Be reng pg boned — eee ata Chartist meeting aor —_ une the , neigh- | jnst., at St. Margaret's Church, ‘Wesminster, Thomas awit Era, oer the 
* . ‘ : e- % i ia hi ical ? i i v ter of J 
fendant with his liability as a shareholder. Mr. Justice Cresswell that he hed done so , the erties  nadeer sala totim, ie admitting Cece Beas eke Naas Se entaanateactha. ti | Gaiters; Mundas, king: 
summed up the case, and stated to the jury that he considered | a leader of Chartt ists, and I will not re - il’ He dom of Hanover, by the Rev. William Kaufman, Frederick Baron von Neydeck 
the defendant bound by having : deed and become a | (Bad th: on rence 'M Tr ees i Lae 5 latel son of the sate Baron van Neydeck, of Bamberg, in the kinkxdom of Bavariy 
cpaseuchten: snd that he Mea eeieuehe Cima ee ee RG, | eer en intros of Mevening © Chattist, mectne?- Ds; | Sourente--On the pa tou 6 dete Quant anemic, by the Rev. Freueiiee 
jary ound poem en a ome to blow Nera sort Pam ectain dettod hava aga ans 9 a , decndoak, Peet adinaed Tony, Edmund ‘t i . ‘fon Passy Bs » Cap’ sin in net Majesty's 4 
bane nat a for the amount claimed, at he was a Chartist; on which the defendant, Badger, aid, | ReBy $0 Catherine Harriet, youngest “Eh caham, Bucks, by the Rev. J. He 
aes | vhs Gace 4. Oe a ed = “Then I will not take your bail either. _We (the magistrates) Talbot, rector of Clifton, Soha Sutthery, Bea. —-_ _e reall, ergy se 
iuomed to his Cordes for a writ of 8 corpus, to to bring up > other — ~ a - : igtets Neth noes we do not think oiler Moje ee Stiernsas Weedon.” ee ; 
the body of Captain we hiemag. ey who is now in ¢ this refusal me. Re state them.’ extn ses Galt a e of D THS — a Oe the 6th inst., at the Views, Huntingdonshire, Vice-Admial 
of having deserted from the service of the Hon ie Rest on the of the defendants was, that O’Neill.con- | Sir Richard Hussey Hussey, K.C-B., G.C.M,.G.—On the 5th inst, #t his house 
Ps The tinued in ly until he was ultimately taken before Chief- | in Whitehall- Wares Sir John Cros, Keight, aged 74, the Jndge of the cont 
‘ompany. pnenen Sogperh at great length, detailed the facts | Justice Tindal under a a writ of habeas corpus, when that learned | Rev ew. On the 6th inst., after a short illness, in the 52d year of his age; us 
of the case, pa ere recently published in our police re- William Shae head ‘Lewis, who for many years was connected with + e Lon 
ort, and contended that desertion meant, in law and Fr 2 odge eccepted. bail for his agg appearance which the | gon Press.—On the 18th ult., at Naples, in the bloom of anhood, of a fever 
po my Po n i ie an | defendants cer ate aca ea affidavits i he stated, that the | canght at Rome, John Harper, Esq., architect, York.—At Hanover, on the Ist 
service, without aay nten- seen woe ants had refused to accept the Messrs. Page a and | inst., aged 24, Laura Georgiana, wife of Gervase Parker Bushe, Esq., attache 
tion of returning to it, and that neither by the laws of our = re on account of ‘thet political pasasens and — sae to her Majesty’s Legation at Hanover.—On the sth inst., at Great Chart» Keay 
nor those of any other country was it rte intended that thes uated: rater corrupt motiv ion ih ps eng bn Bon Pep len T a — - gee ag hy pr i 
i ois { t Ts ¢ x 
veral penalties of death, ransportation, or ot ther daaiiebavent Under a these dreatauees, he (Mr. Erle) A os that my he tik feats, be his Nonee ie plese, Upeer Clapton, Thomas Petts Esq-y 
aw ¢ inflicted upon a person who | lordship would be of pms = bp pened to the rule he > dos gm square, Mineries, d 64.—On the 3d instant, at Low oe 
had merely overstay ed his or gone from the place for which | prayed for, Mr. — thing we tes rrey, in his 79h year, William Hodgson, Esq, late of the Navy y OffiCe> 5 | 
the leave had been oi ie some other locality. It had never | tion on the part ore actonabaaead hake print ofthe ee 
before been contended that a person who upon receiving leave | affidavits which the learned aap: had read. All that sauared Printed by Messrs. Pravsury and Evass, Lombard-street, Fleet~ -street, bs 
to go to the Cape had Sead os to Madeira was to be treated as a | from those affidavits was, that magistrates therein named had <6 Sanaa of basse eae in the City ef London, and Plage &  ciawes 
deserter, or that a soldier would become liable to the penalties | thought that their duty was not rondaed tk mereinquiry intothe | Utee ail aavereoments axa Ce Com SS eto te met Oe eae othe 
of that offence because. havi @ furlough for Birmingham, he ! sufficiency of the bail tendered, but that they ought to extend ! Editor.—Saturday, November 12, 184%. 
