1842. ] 
THE GARDENERS CHRONICLE. 
TT 
homed Akhbar mtn to prepare for our immediate d epar- 
ture towards Toorkistan. ge tarted at : p-m., Troup 
the Sirdar, and Mrs, T 
During the march, as "Salih Mahomed and IT had bevome 
ntimate, on eettek of the 29th August, I 
yately proposed to him that if would forsake Ma- 
d Akhbar, and carry us off through the mountains in 
the direction of force, which we heard was near, 
General, we would give 
tt’s arm n 1th we hear our horror 
e order had arrived during the night for our im- 
ediate depar to loom. Shortly afterwards I 
ceived ssage from Salih Mahomed Khan that he 
onl os see patie light omar: and -myself,in a private 
on obeyed th ann ha n 
ike tbat it Tad reference to Agia rme 
WwW sem 
march to Kooloom, and produced the letter, which sta 
that we were to be moved over to the Walee, or chief, and 
tha ers- regarding us must b eyed; he then 
Ww who was for- 
o. 
ad brought him 
om on sis ‘Mohoolal that on condition 
of his w= tbs us ir ringin into Cabool, he would 
General Pollock 20,000 rupees and 1,000 
li 
bo | 
° 
B 
Go 
release, we t were 
into a porepnillee, vebisined the sahetiok of every aes 
and lady sum as we mi hereafter 
they of Seek ae the a ae ober, ae to. the 
best of our ae to effect ou We told 
Salih Mah 
off, our water ant be ter rig On the ie all y¢ prin- 
cipal chiefs came in to make their obeisance to us, an 
art of th 
rupees, which ad collected ; on the 
thong pavers to send three or fo ur r officers | into the 
sold dier ae an 
my aig tte of Burnett, ie Crawford f 
charge. We ur beddings there, and took military and aa 
‘ils, 
a the ditch, repaired the holes, 
When we heard of 
s bee ahomed 
Alchbar’ 8 defeer: xt Tenet all 8 sdacotiong sky a siege 
Were stopped, e determined to force our way to 
| Cabool with our small guard, gor to effect our release 
Solely through n exertions. On the morning of the 
16th we took our departure, and halted about ten miles 
Off ; on the ae crossed the igi seca? 000 fe 
high, and halted near Kharzar, where we were met by the 
10K Rehab. Geos ok our 
under thefcommand ow 
the 19th we were me 
al 
ee, where 
kinn 
mho ns = pr’ be: as ‘ocee 
that Journal by the p 
from which we iat the follo 
is to be 
ight on isi wonsortal antiqui 
s from the pe 
in the w 
T OF ExcHEeQuver.— 
ntention of ende 
cessive gambling 5 
ny 
a 
J 
him i 
the berty on ei 
ym it had been won 
ing that’ step, the s 
person not adopti 
any person shou 
ne mc ojet 
nares ee the night with my friend 
on here on the morning of the 2ist, 
onih. pend si quarters with my old shipmate Burn, 
Sosicdas morning all the prisoners“ came into camp, 
hen there was a Royal salute fired, and here we all are, 
ha men and women can be who buta few days a 
rkistan, 
med Akhbar! had sent orders to put death all those 
Kool 
A Cor 
inp. "Chronisla a ‘Philadel hie has addre 
by t ths 
ing 
published bere, slp will fg editions 
ntral Am 
—he e days. 
with astonishment; but they had amon 
tion, no sus e 
innumerable, strewn to 
st and superb in its character; and all i wn stone, 
ornaments and style resembling those of ancient 
Egypt; and now modern wild Indians. Mr. 
Norman says it must have been one of the largest cities 
orld.” 
a 
Cou Smith v 
pd recover he the defendant, nde the statute of net certain 
hi of haz: The saat 
rr. es 
t the present action had been brought under an 
i ei f en 
Vv t petson 
g, lose more than 10/., it should be competent in 
+} f SS . ‘ 
and further, that in 
= “4 ae in the event of his 5 gaining a verdict, he wa 
oe oO y 0 of t the 
respondent of the Morn- 
sed a letter to 
t aritesd at t Lis orpdol, 
work 
passage :— 
_ 
-: to nd.—This was an action 
the cou 
ase eiacthe 
finest 
‘om ex- 
prev uld, 
find for the 
counts; and 
laintiff on the 
r the 
The ara after a consulta’ 
verdict 
or for the ae — 
35 
ours, 
the House of Commons; that he d 
himself ; that on the 4 br 
he Speaker sh 
deputies ; and Secenlieg the € plai 
which to find _ ing A went 
ntinued there. 
d inv: ouse contrary L 
ot 
ge ct humble in 
gnitied $0 
the g the loc ks 
idee. that on the 27th jury, ed plain 
sobe 
8, which 
mt 4 
"s 
cation, as to en’ 
w 
ecour 
: pec quthorik j 
bad the | Sheriffs, an: 
831, 
sneering tat esoeaeneeieaanseeecaanacaneins 
entitled to belief. If it was entitied to i to credence, then 
they would 
sixth, and ninth 
a, fourth, 
@efendant, in net mr ae of all positive proof 
of payment, on the third, wen ar coe gee and 
d tenth 
of about 20 minutes, returned a 
for the plaintiff on the counts named by the learned Judge, 
be the others. The dam inclu: oe 
mages, 
ossett, the son of the siteged at 
aintiff’s ony: on — _ 
oc d 8, &e. 
Parc mtr bestows hs : 
doors; and as to the 
ord to sttend 
et 
84 
nt t 
wh searched the 
st the oppre 
fully in the cotanath of agreat constitutional question. He hed 
no right to ask for ages in that way like a mod pde 
—the champion and the victim of a og Lee oceedin It did nut 
— here whether the warrant w “was not ill 2 
nr thin from the beginning. 
ere Ww er , for ex 
s in the execution of it made the artes executing. it wen 
This case had been erroneously ree 
+, +}. 
pres i 
of the e of Commons were involved. The privileges of the 
Ho — had nothing to do with the matter. The officers of the 
Hous dered to pe n 
been o1 
ing it they eee comuaitted “s 
House left th 
an 
, with pe 
tatute went on to say, that 
ld have the right = sue for the said sammitigns ; 
8 to be en- 
ant recovered, whilst the oth er 
moiet: 
euineniiied: It was, therefore, under 
action had been brought. 
to contend with, from the indispo: 
ns, to place credit in the evidess 
i what w enomin 
as that taro ulda e 
— of difculty on roa ‘teed and 
t of his pesrkgea that 
offences set forth in the 
fendant had for Bo 
set sponte —~ = tee 
seg: 
pal witness 
of v 
r witnesses Ww 
the cance ne it was argu 
at suena es 
y: 
and not ‘2 
tend 
ore submit, th 
be given that the money had 
effect a com a Ht aig 
charged m 
Lor 
bea to 0 the honest industry 0 
on in porte 
ae ee eamaate which hi d bee! 
hose matters i 
s, For 
me ago Col 
In bringing such a case as 
fore the jury, he was fully aware of the difficulties he should have 
— , on the part of many per- 
{3 in 
wa: 
had Bp in defendant's “enips oy; he deposed 
us losses gaat we Lesgpi noblemen and ia 
to 
f their ‘oanartivn losses, and the payment of t 
ued ee Mr. 
of th age ti 
nw = which oon ahr nes b aintain 
ed ehevefore’ that the action cou re em 
he would submit that it was manifestly = boop cinagee offence the 
liament contem t the 
t 
aes peamelss ae inthe pen a it wanes 
He cti _ 
1 witness. Lor rd Abinger said, ‘that 
principa ores se peers 
ope—on thos: 
a and, a aay the Serdict 
y- 
as to whether the H vary gay 
is evidence, and the 
formation, and it was for ene to 
which tre cause them to 
wh pi 
e ene of that witnes: 
ced an action 
that statute that the peeecet 
as th 
d the ‘‘ play’ world; but he 
eat 
esent Peres; the statements of the 
paid either in cash, or b 
a os 
pt won. 
e act of 
mney so won; 
dit 
en iby the faeet, 
He 3 wo 
Stanho 
Mr. Platt 4 
an 
ing—a vice a 
source 
art, he had 
h the bar of that 
He (the Attomey- esis did not regret its dissolution, 
t—but @ 
d amidst nie laughter, 
or my learned 2 ~~ notwithstanding - his = 
re rhage fein his ead Par 
ont t 
nothing of a public nature in ‘ 
need not have assu such air oidness—the boldness of 
a ready martyr—when addressing the Court on this very ordinary 
case. The House of Commons he had attac was de His 
Learned Friend he had “ws gor would have been jus tas t 
House the 
+ ae 
you, gentlemen,” 
be in no fear fo 
on Sete ene 
Smal 
<-> 
= 4 
“iis Teatned fie en ath 
but Bas he knew cer 
tion and the plea s, and pee 
plaeaings the firs 
was issued? On 
that the issuing o 
trespass being a bar 
great and ¢ 
de xtraor dim 
tw 
m to defend t 
° m 
bse the verdict war ey for 
theiss allegation 0. 
But at e residue of the eres: it was admii 
fe cigectn - bo there had 
excess of 
consider the disturbance ad “ man’s faraily, and ail the "other 
um the case was true that 
emselv 
it 
House 
8 to the eg ve assu 
~ that you ied 
E 
abuse poe ge 
n 
ak thre was not a single indivie 
He admitted that, 
to go to bees he house and se tem for 
alsa 
they liable i 
et tated Me Tength the ne pa the ‘declara- 
eplication, and 
t qu estion was, whether t 
the ae _— ha rete given 
ng “3 - (the 
the persons commit. 
es w with civility w 
eir . 
as forthe jury to 
t of damages the 
whic b the —— ay ee ‘The 
obe 
i. Tho se who had 
ry P 
ary oceasiond, ought to be careful how 
they 
the ec inst 
care not to exceed thos 
been Sropenty and fair 
damages, teen 
award that r 
en 
= 
aural the 
fer: 
ssiatitt pene 
most 
pn a rset eat acre be 
ward’s-heath Station, at a distance 
don, — was a cutting 
a descent to that 
acciden 
ance, of the lawful a sof 
oa aoe —_ = aan in ae hands 
day the plsint, wth his oe ar dangers a 
a pc _— a the rail sot, taking 
front. se pa gt is servants, 
pore the ‘Gopybold-cutting. 7 
eres 4. Thet 
the Lpowee they meocming 
a. 
mit evidence here had 
the 
The jory 
d then returned a verdict for the 
recover from 
Carpue v. the Deventer rs 0; sor a and ao sce Railway 
ral rag nA 
Co was an 
compensa‘ ain or an inury sustalned by the plaintif! te 
ae n om oe m), ze “pr eged - negligence of ei 
rvants ; mages 1,0004. ao 
wad pleaded—Are, Not Guilty, by statatewas pe corral ey 
denied the allegation as to the wantof care and ‘made by the 
eclaratio Whee 2 crmey- General, in siting he, cas, aoe 
poy Pad at a Pe er ef whitch bed bet 
the jury hvala +p the and the Seem ‘which ha n 
this ine. of rat 8h Upon that 
‘vants, te 
a x ince inthe 
his daughters 
the station called Hay- 
it 36 miles a 
here was 
of mw t descent the 
© servants of 
