1921.] Numismatic Supplement No. XXXV. 81 
There is nothing honorific ahout them, and every one of 
them may, with perfect propriety, be applied to and is actually 
found in conjunction with a score at least of Indian toponyms 
cIlsJ} Rio ‘ Resting-place of Empire’ attracts notice as 
the distinctive title of Akbarabad on the coins, only about the 
for Agra, or actually associated with the name of the town in - 
the pee td chronicles of the reigns of Shah Jahan, 
J one and eve 
At some ine’ in the first year of his reign, Bahadur Shah, 
Shah ‘ Risk: I, appears to have introduced a change. Akbarabad 
was henceforth to be called Sle!}.;2i0 and its own appellation 
wsilsJ} i.0 was to be transferred to Ajmer. This was prob- 
ably done when the Emperor was encamped at or in the near 
neighbourhood of that town on account of the troubles in 
Rajputana. 
Ajit Singh of Jodhpir had ‘‘ after the death of Aurangzeb,”’ 
writes Khafi Khan, ‘‘again showed his disobedience and re- 
bellion by oppressing Musalmans, forbidding the killing of 
cows, preventing the summons to prayer, razing the mosques 
which had been built after the destruction of the idol-temples 
in the late reign, and repairing and building anew idol-temples. 
He warmly supported and assisted the arm ana of 
Udiptr, and was closely allied with Raja Jaisingh, whose 
son-in-law he was. He had carried his disaffection so far that 
he had not attended at Court since the accession. On the 8th 
[7th in text] Sha‘aban [lst year], the Emperor marched to 
punish ea rebel and his tribe, by way of Amber, the native 
land of Jaisingh.”’ Elliot and Dowson, VII. 404-5. Thecamp 
is sa hessiy oan to have been between Ajmer and Chitor when 
the month of ee arrived.' Text, II, 606, ll. 2-3. The 
- Emperor was at Ajmer itself soon afterwards, and paid the 
customary imperial visit to the shrine of the ‘ great Khwaja.’ 
Ibid., 608, ll. 18-20. 
He appears to have stayed there for some time, and left 
only when the hostile proceedings of Kam Bakhsh and the 
near approach of the rainy season rendered it necessary to 
march forthwith to the Dakhan. Jbid., 616, ll. 4-5. It may, 
I think, be reasonably conjectured that the earliest coins of 
1 Some interesting ‘Mughal Farmans, Parwanahs 
year of the exalted accession.” [ .H.] In two other papers also the 
sbp ysF} SLI} pune & yo is expressly mentioned. Journal of the Panjab 
Historical Society. Vol. V (1915), pp. 32, 33, 35. 
