1921.| Numismatic Supplement No. XXXV. 169 
but in the case of my coin the execution is remarkably good, 
as fine as that on any coin of Muhammad ibn Tughlaq, and 
vastly superior to that of other gold coins of Fath Khan that 
I bave seen. Thomas describes his currency as provincial in 
appearance and experience bears out this verdict; but it 
would seem that the issues degenerated unless this particular 
piece was struck as a specimen by a craftsman from the 
impcrial capital. 
2. A.H. 761. Mint (?) Shahr Patna. [1.M.C., No. 462.] 
Wt. 169°2 grs., s. °8. 
Obv. in circle. Rev. in double circles. 
cle YW w) af ; gle 
ct! ene o!l al Say? yissis 
a star above js, 
Margin : 5 (c=! aie (8 aihy sgt S aS.J! xo [Tentative 
reading. | 
3. Date and mint illegible. 
(Rodgers, J.A.S.B., 1886, No. 3, p. 186.] 
Wt. 170 grains. 
Obv. in circle. Rev. 
cle wt St 9 Sy! 
BI) one col pall on o. 
wale pel Jay? aa 
assMS wold ab ate 
Margin :—-@:beame 5... Soo)} BH ayy? 
This remarkable coin is manifestly later than the others. 
It must be later than 763 H. and it might be urged that owing 
to the elaboration in the title of the prince, his viceroyalty 
had been changed for that of the western provinces, a charge 
which was unquestionably held at one time by his younger 
brother Zafar. The coin passed into the possession of General 
Yunningham and 1 have not been able to trace its present 
whereabouts. 
Billon. 
These coins are of two denominations only, one being a 
large billon of some 140 grains and the other a small coin of 
the usual 56 grains or 32-rati type. The variations are unim- 
portant. 
4. Wt. 142 grs., s. °7. [I.M.C., No. 463.] 
