Synopsis of the British Recent Foraminifera. By H. B. Brady. 883 



Miliolina ferussacii, d'Orbigny, sp. 



Quinqueloculina ferussacii, d'Orbigny, 1826, Ann, Sci. Nat., vol. vii. 



p. 301, No. 18 ;— Modele, No. 32. 

 Miliolina hicornis, var. angulata, Williamson, 1858, Eec. For, Gt. Br., 



p. 88, pi. vii. fig. 196. 

 By no means common, though widely distributed. 



Miliolina hicornis, Walker and Jacob, sp. 



Serpula hicornis, Walker and Jacob, 1798, Adams's Essays, Kanmacher's 



ed., p. 633, pi. xiv. fig. 2. 

 Miliolina hicornis, Williamson, 1858, Kec. For. Gt. Br., p. 87, pi. vii. 

 figs. 190-192. 

 Not uncommon in shallow dredgings. 



Miliolina houeana, d'Orbigny, sp. 



Quinqueloculina houeana, d'Orbigny, 1846, For. Foss. Vien., p. 293, 



pi. xix. figs. 7-9. 

 Miliolina houeana, Siddall, 1886, Proc. Lit. Phil. Soc. Liverpool, vol. xl. 

 Appendix, p. 51. 



If it be needful to recognize by name the comparatively finely striate 

 forms of Miliolina which have not retort-shaped segments, as distinct 

 from those that have, Qidnqueloculina houeana is perhaps the most 

 convenient type to accept ; better, I think, than Triloculina hrongni- 

 artiana, d'Orb. 



Of their distribution (apart from M. hicornis) we have little reliable 

 information. 



Miliolina pulchella, d'Orbigny, sp. 



Quinqueloculina mdchella, d'Orbigny, 1826, Ann. Sci. Nat., vol. vii. 



p. 303, No. 42 ;— Soldani, 1798, Testae, 

 vol. ii. p. 53, pi. xviii. fig. /. 

 „ „ Brady, 1864, Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., 



vol. xxiv. p. 466, pi. xlviii. fig. 4. 

 In dredgings at depths of thirty or forty fathoms or more at various 

 points on the coast ; somewhat rare. 



Miliolina fusca, Brady. 



Quinqueloculina fusca, Brady, 1870, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, 

 vol. vi. p. 286, pi. xi. fig. 2. 

 Common in estuaries and brackish-water pools. 



Miliolina agglutinans, d'Orbigny, sp. 



Quinquelocidina agglutinans, d'Orbigny, 1839, Foram. Cuba, p. 168, 



pi. xii. figs. 11-13. 

 „ „ Brady, 1870, Edinburgh Catalogue, p. 2. 



The first British specimens assigned to this species were subchitinous 

 forms from brackish water, subsequently described under a distinct name, 



