922 Transactions of the Society. 



Pulvinulina concenirica Brady, 1864, Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., vol. xxiv. 

 p. 470, pi. xlviii. fig. 14. 

 Shetland, 75 to 90 fathoms (Brady, Waller). 



Pulvinulina auricula, Fichtel and Moll, sp. 



Nautilus auricula, var. a, Fichtel and Moll, 1803, Test. Micr., p. 108, 

 pi. XX. figs, a, h, c. 

 var. /3, Id., Ibid., figs, c?, e,/. 

 Botalina ohlonga, WilUamson, 1858, Eec. For. G-t. Br., p. 51, pi. iv. 

 figs. 98-100. 

 Widely distributed. 



Pulvinulina menardii, d'Orbigny, sp. 



Botalia menardii, d'Orbigny, 1826, Ann. Sci. Nat., vol. vii. p. 273, 

 No. 26 ;— Modele, No. 10. 



Pulvinulina menardii, Brady, 1868, Eeport Brit. Assoc, Newcastle- 

 upon-Tyne Meeting, Trans, p. 101. 

 Off Laxey, Isle of Man, 15 fathoms (Brady) ; Irish Sea and coast of 



Dubhn (BalkwiU and Wright). 



Pulvinulina canariensis, d'Orbigny, sp. 



Botalina canariensis, d'Orbigny, 1839, Foram. Canaries, p. 130, pi. i. 



figs. 34-36. 

 Pulvinulina canariensis, Brady, 1870, Edinburgh Catalogue, p. 8. 



Hebrides (Brady) ; estuary of the Dee (Siddall) ; shore-sand, Gralway 

 (BalkwiU and Millett) ; south-west of Ireland (Wright). 



Pulvinulina patagonica, d'Orbigny, sp. 



Botalina pataffonica, d'Orbigny, 1839, Foram. Amer. Merid., p. 36, 



pi. ii. figs. 6-8. 

 Pulvinulina scitula, BalkwiU and Millett, 1884, Joum. Micr. and Nat. 



Sci., vol. iii. p. 85, pi. iv. fig. 12. 

 Shore-sand, Galway, a single specimen (BalkwiU and Millett) ; south- 

 west of Ireland, 54 to 120 fathoms, rare ; ofi" Belfast Lough, 30 to 60 

 fiithoms, very rare (Wright). 



Pulvinulina micheliniana, d'Orbigny, sp. 



Botalina micheliniana, d'Orbigny, 1840, Mem. Soc. geol. France, 



vol. iv. p. 31, pi. iii. figs. 1-3. 

 Pulvinulina micheliniana, Wright, 1886, Proc. E. Irish Acad., ser. 2, 

 vol. iv. (Science) p. 614. 



Various points to the south-west of Ireland, 48 to 120 fathoms 

 (Wright). 



Pulvinulina crassa is inserted in the ' Edinburgh Catalogue' (p. 8), 

 on the ground of one or two specimens believed to be referrible to that 

 species obtained from Mr. Jeffreys' Hebrides dredgings. The mounting 

 has unfortunately been mislaid, but it appears to me not improbable that 

 the shells in question may have belonged to the present closely allied 

 form ; at any rate, without more evidence than at present exists, the 

 retention of the name in the British list is scarcely warranted. 



