1902.] MR. H. R, HOGG ON AUSTRALIAN SPIDERS. 121 



EXPLANATION OP THE PLATES. 

 Plate XI. 



Fig. 1. JVacaduha atromarginata, $ , p. 113. 



2. „ „ ? , p. 114. 



3. Una purpurea, $ , p. 114. 



4. Soraga ametJiystus, $ , p, 118. 



5. „ „ ? , p. 118. 



6. TVargeum ceramicum, $ ? P- 115. 



7. Candalides helenita, $ , p. 119. 



8. „ „ ?,p. 119. 



9. lalmenus dementi, $ , p. 120. 



10. „ ddmeli, $ , p. 120. 



11. „ eichorni, p. 120. 



12. „ ddmeli, ? , p. 120. 



Plath XII. 



Fig. 1. JEpamera sappirus, $ , p. 117. 



2. „ mermis, S > P- 117. 



3. Argiolaiis silas, var. lalos, $ , p. 117. 



4. „ „ „ ?,p. 117. 



5. „ lukahas, J, p. 117. 



6. „ Julius, $ , p. 117. 



7. „ paneperata, $ , p. 117. 



8. „ menas, $ , p. 117. 



9. „ „ ? , p. 117. 



7. On some Additions to the Australian Spiders of the 

 Suborder Mygalomorphge. By H. H. Hogg, M.A., F.Z.S. 



[Received May 6, 1902.] 

 (Plate XIII.i & Text-figures 22-27.) 



A numerous collection of Spiders belonging to the South Austra- 

 lian Museum, Adelaide, very kindly sent me by Professor Stirling, 

 F.R.S., has enabled me to make some important additions to those 

 I enumerated in a paper read to the Society last year (see P. Z. S. 

 1901, vol. ii. p. 218). 



Of the subfamily Actinopodince there are no specimens. Its 

 Australian genus Eriodon Latr. has been located at Perth in the 

 West, and in Victoria and New South Wales to the East ; so it 

 might naturally be expected to exist in South Australia, but has 

 not so far been recorded thence". 



The Cte7iizmce, on the other hand, are well represented, and I 

 have to contribute to that subfamily two new genera, Blakistonia 

 and Dym^cyops, of one species each, and to the Rev. 0. P. Cam- 

 bridge's genus Aganippe two new species. As the latter seem 

 to form with Eucyrtops Pocock (antice Aganippe) latior Cambr. 

 (PL XIII. fig. 5) and Aganippe subtristis Cambr. (PI. XIII. fig. 6) 



1 For explanation of the Plate, see p. 142, 



- I may here mention on the authority of the Rev. 0. P. Cambridge that his 

 species, Eriodon formidahile, has really ori\.y four spinnerets, as I suggested in the 

 paper above cited, and not six, as originally stated (Journ. Linn. Soc, Zool. vol. x. 

 1868, p. 266). 



