1909. | MAMMALS FROM WESTERN JAVA. 383 
1669, 1670, 1671, 1673. Pangandaran, Dirk de Vries Bay, 8. 
Java. 
Most of these specimens are rather larger than is indicated in 
Temminck’s description, which gives a forearm length of “ 1 duim 
7 lijnen” (=43 mm)*. Their forearms range from 43°5 to 
48 mm. 
39. TAPHOZOUS LONGIMANUS Hardw. 
¢o.6. Batavia. Sea-level. 
6. 672. Tijilatjap. Sea-level. 
These specimens are paler than usual, but this may be due to 
bleaching, or to a variation of the same nature as that found in 
Blyth’s “ fulvidus.” 
40, TapHozovus THEOBALDI Dobs. 
6. 1415, 1417, 1418, 1419, 1420, 1469, 1479, 1480, 1496. 
@. 1416, 1426, 1478, 1495. Kalipoetjang, Tji-Tandoei R., 8. 
Java. 
3 56,5 2 in spirit. Do. 
This rare Bat was hitherto only known from the typical speci- 
mens in the Calcutta Museum, of which one has been given to 
the British Museum, and has enabled us to compare Mr. Short- 
ridge’s specimens with it. We can find no essential difference 
between the Javan and Tenasserim forms, although when fresh 
skins of the latter are available some difference in colour may 
prove to exist. 
As represented by the Javan specimens, 7. theobaldi has a 
blackish throat, recalling the black beard of 7’. melanopogon, but 
the black is not so deep nor so sharply defined laterally as in that 
animal. 
41. TAPpHozous sACCOLAIMUs Temm. 
2. 1363. Tasikmalaja, Preanger. 
42, CHG@REPHON PLICATUS Buch.-Ham. 
3. 58, 59, 62,112. 9.57. Buitenzorg. 850’. 
3. 535,537. ©. 508, 534, 536. Soekaboemi. 
3. 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 952, 954, 955, 956, 957, 971. 
@. 951, 953. Tyilatjap. 
@. 1290. Tasikmalaja, Preanger. 1150’. 
And1¢,5 @ inal. Batavia. 
Represent Horsfield’s Vyctinomus tenuis and dilatatus. 
The Tjilatjap specimens Nos. 946-957 are all quite young. 
“Very active on the ground, and even when young and unable 
to fly is able to run about like a mouse, especially in rough situa- 
tions.” —G. C. 8. 
* Not 40 as stated by Miller, who has taken Temminck’s measurement as though 
the inches were English ones instead of French. As a consequence, there is no 
difference at all in size between H. monticola and EF. peninsularis Miller. 
