1909. ] OF THE LEPIDOPTEROUS GENUS LYCEHNOPSIS. 45] 
and dilectissima. This marginal line varies in argiolus, tenella, and 
other species from absence to considerable prominence. 
21. coalita de Nicéville, J. B. N. H. S. vi. p. 363, pl. F. 
figs. 12-13. 
Assuming a specimen in the British Museum to be, as I fear it 
is not, correctly named, the appendages, like the fly itself, are very 
like dilecta. The clasps are longer, 1:13 mm. against 0:93 mm., 
the neck-like portion longer and straighter, 7. ¢., its sides are more 
parallel and the spinous process is appreciably larger, bolder, and 
less bent down. 
I believe I have not seen a specimen of true coalita de Nicév. 
These appendages are even more like those of rona (biagi) than 
those of dilecta. If it be not coalita, it may be a form of rona, 
or else a new species. 
Text-fig. 87. 
Named coalita in B.M. Coll. (probably erroneously). X 38. 
22. cardia Felder, Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-nat. Cl. xl. 
p. 459 (1860). 
Ihave felt some difficulty in discriminating this from dilecta 
Moore, both in the superficial characters and in the appendages, 
and am still doubtful whether they do not approach each other 
within the limits of geographical races of one species—dilecta 
being the continental, cardia the insular form; though such 
a distinction does not quite agree with the localities of specimens 
examined, a specimen from North Borneo being indistinguishable 
