1909. ] OF THE LEPIDOPTEROUS GENUS LYCENOPSIS. 473 
41. deliciosa Pagenstecher, Ent. Nach. xxii. p. 50; figured Abh. 
Senck. Ges. xxiii. pl. xx. fig. 8. 
I have not seen this insect and can say nothing beyond what 
Dr. Butler remarks as to its doubtful claim to be a Lycenopsis. 
BovruRrini, n. nom. 
Lothria, amended from SLotria (Rondani), is in use for a 
dipterous genus, therefore it is necessary to rename Bothria 
(mihi, P. Z. 8. 1908, p. 677). I suggest Bothrinia. 
42. nebulosa Leech, Ent. xxii. p. 43. 
This species belongs to the Everids and to the same genus as 
chennellit, viz. Bothrinia, and is not a Lycenopsid at all. 
The appendages have the characteristic dorsal armature, the 
two (usually) side pieces fused into one in the middle line (as in 
Everes, Cupido, &e.), and the clasps with two branches of equal 
and considerable length. In this case the outer or dorsal branch 
has a flowing curve not dissimilar to that of the same branch in 
Everes, but curiously both branches are much alike, each ending 
in three obtuse but sharp spines. 
The neuration (anastomosis of veins 11 and 12 of fore wing) is 
also that of Everes, not of Lycenopsis. 
The row of spots under the fore wing, like those of chennellii, 
are in line; in Lycenopsis those above vein 6 are usually more or 
less moved inwards. This is not a constant character as between 
Everids and Lyczenopsids, but there is so much difference in this 
respect that it may almost be so regarded. 
43. chennelli is also an Everid (Lothrinia), not only not a 
Lycenopsis, but not in the same group of Lycenids 
(see Proc. Zool. Soc. 1908, p. 676). 
ARTOPOETES, n. g.* 
44, pryeri. 
Whether on his own or what other authority Dr. Butler 
(Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. v. 1900, p. 442) places this species 
in Lycenopsis, | do not know. I may say with Mr. Murray, who 
first described it, “It is not closely allied to any species with 
which I am acquainted.” The clasps are so divided that it has 
the appearance of having two pairs of clasps, a condition I have 
not noticed in any other (very few, no doubt) Lycenid I have 
examined, though there is some resemblance to it in Tarucus nara. 
* aptomovs—baker. (There is already a genus Artopoia.) 
Proc. Zoou, Soc.—1909, No. XXXI. 3] 
