MBAU AND VITLLUVU. 167 



them seemed to give as much pain as if I had gone 

 into a Christian cliurch and used tlie chahce for diinking 

 water.' 



There has hitherto been a tendency to ascribe most of the 

 revolting practices of the Fijians, such as launching tlieir 

 war canoes over the bodies of their captives, using tliem, in 

 fact, as rollers, interring them at tlie base of the posts sup- 

 porting the chief's houses, or boiling or baking them ahve, to 

 what is supposed to be an innate ferocity and love of cruelty 

 in these islanders. But it is admitted, that the peculiar 

 features of their religion, and the use made of them by their 

 priests, must have tended to infuse a taste for these revolting 

 practices. It requires, however, no great knowledge of the 

 antecedents of European civilisation, to be aware that the 

 greatest refinements of cruelty, and the most brutal disregard 

 of human suffering, have been, at one time or other and in 

 various places connected with rehgion at comparatively 

 advanced periods of national progress. Baking and boiling- 

 alive have a terrific sound, and are regarded as indications 

 of a very savage condition ; but the slow combustion by fire 

 of the living heretic, the frightful tortures of the Inquisition, 

 or the peine dure et forte, and other brutalities of the civil 

 process, are facts equally remarkable for their cruelty, 

 equally depreciatory of our nature, yet were not deformities 

 belonging to our savage state. We must be careful, there- 

 fore, how we ascribe the ferocities of the Fijians to some 

 radical imperfection in their character. 



In truth, there is evidence to prove there is no lack in 



