1901.] 



AISTATOMT OF CHRYSOCHLORIS TREA^ELTANT. 



27 



labour is merely to bear witness to the reliability of ray prede- 

 cessor's work, there are certain points in \A'liich we differ in the 

 record of facts and others in the interpretation of facts on the 

 accuracy of which we are both agreed. 



Since completing the dissection of these two specimens, I 

 have had the opportunity of examining a third, which has been 

 prepared for the muscle series of the College of Surgeons Museum ; 

 so that all the following observations are founded on at least 

 two, sometimes three animals, and one is less likely to be misled 

 by individual variations. 



Text-fig. 6. 



Superficial Dissection of Chry^ocUorh tremlya 



A. Occipito-fronlalis. 



B. Levator labii superioris. 



C. Masseter. 



D. External auditory meatus 



E. Oceipito-cuticularis. 



F. Cervico-Ciiticularis. 

 Gr. Acromio-cuticularis. 

 H. Anterior trapezius. 



H'. Posterior trapezius. 

 J. Dorso-cuticularis. 

 K. Rhomboid. 

 , L'. Triceps. 



M. Serratus magnus. 

 N. Latissimus dorsi. 

 O. Superficial pannicalus (reflected). 

 P. Anterior mammary gland. 

 P'. Posterior ditto. 

 Q,. Serratus posticus. 

 R. Ecto-gluteus. 

 S. Caudo-femoralis. 

 T. Semitendinosus. 

 U. Biceps I'emoris. 

 V. Extei-nal oblique. 

 W. Vastus exteruus. 



The joints have been examined with the view of carrying on the 

 work w'hich I began for the Hunterian Lectures at the College ot 

 Surgeons in 1899 \ I have not burdened the paper with the 

 points in which the joints of Ghrysocliloris agree with those of a 

 generalized mammal ;' but by comparing the present paper with the 

 lectures ah-eady referred to, it will be possible to get a good idea 

 of the details of the articulations of the animal. 



1 Journ. Anat. & Phys. vol. xxxiv. 



