Vol. 1X, No. 7.] Laksmanasena. 283 
S.] 
17... . Htiasmat kathamanyatha ripu badha vaidhavya 
vaddhavrato vikhyata ksitipala maulir-abhavat Sri-Visvavandyo 
into 
Btasmit kathamanyatha ripubadhi...... Sri- Visvaripo 
ny 
3 the ground of this correction Babu Nagendra Nath 
has stated that the Elilpur grant also was issued by Visva- 
adjunct. But if Viévaripo is taken to be a proper name, we 
Shall have to admit that the verses following this refer to 
Visvariipasena and not to Laksmanasena. Consequently Tada- 
devi must be acknowledged to be the queen of Visvarupasena 
and not Laksmanasena. Finally we shall have to acknowledge 
that sie was the son of king Visvarupa by the 
queen Tada-dev 
In reality the Edilpur grant was issued by Kesavasena, a 
os 
Gaudesvara. Thus the existence of two sons of Laksmanasena 
is proved by their inscriptions. It has already been stated 
above that the Edilpur grant of wie mioe contains all the 
verses of the Madaanphds grant and some more in addition. 
The immediate pet from this is. that Visvartpasena was 
KeSavasena’s predecess 
The Edilpur oak ee mentions KeSavasena, and in 
name Visva ian occurs tavice sad in ‘each case it is eile 
that the engraver was very much in want of space. Thee 
was that the four letters are smaller than the other fare in 
the same line. Most probably a name pape’ of three syl- 
lables was erased and the name Visvaripa consisting of four 
syllables engraved in its place. The ae Abad mentions a 
king named Madhi Sen after Lakhan Sen. This name wrongly 
sce ta chats is evidently Madhava Sena, and, if Atkinson ' is 
correct, we possess a record of this king also which however 
has still ye be deciphered. If we assume that in the Madana- 
pada grant the name of Madhava was erased and Visvarupa 
engraved in its stead, we have the following genealogy of the 
Sena kings of Bengal 
1 E. Atkinson’s ees p. 516; see J.A.S.B., 1896, pt. 1, p. 28, 
note 1. 
