292 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. (July, 1913. 
Bengal dealing with the history of Pegu,! Major-General Sir 
Arthur Phayre pointed out that there was a remarkable simi- 
larity between the language of the Mun (otherwise known as 
Mon or Talaing) of Pegu and that of the Munda of Chutia Nag- 
pur,” and almost immediately after the publication of Mr. Ball’s 
paper Sir Arthur Phayre pointed out that his (Mr. Ball’s) 
nd only corroborated the argument derived from linguistic 
sonuerat Otis. 
As remarked before, the specimen (No. 6114) is of arena- 
ceous clay while the specimen “ante 6103 is of slate. Implement 
No. 6114 was found in Cachar. A very short account of tne 
Geology of the North Gabba: hills has been published by Mr. 
LaTouc the,* and considering that Konarpara, the fin d-spot of 
specimen No. 6114, is situated at the foot of the Tertiary hills, 
al 1 Jour. As. Soc. Béiiadi Vol. XLII, pt. 1, pp. 23-57 me pp. ie 
- Op. Cit 35. 
, s Proc. As. Soc. Bengal, 1876 » P There appears to be a little con- 
foskad in Sir Arthur Phayre’s use of gon word Ko : Hoe uses the terms 
Munda and a as Synonymous, but the word Kol is used to include the 
Munda nd Oraon tribes, and thou gh th Mane and the Ho are 
a 1 sete Pa each ihe the Oraons are nite distinct from both of 
them, 
+ Records, Geol. Surv. Ind., Vol. XVI, pt. 4, pp. 202-203. 
