Vol. IX, No. 11.] Numismatic Supplement. 483 
[NV .8.] 
words [Shahi] Jarukha. This is a new name. Coin No. 13, 
Pl. VIII of Cunningham’s “‘ Coins of the White Huns,’’ is a very 
similar piece, but the name on that is Jabula. 
No. 18. Cp. ‘‘ Coins of the White Huns,’’ Plate IX, No. 1. 
Cunningham read the inscription as Vaiga, but it may be 
Khega, or Khege. 
No 
Q 
ae. - ‘*White-King Sale Catalogue,’’ Part I, 
No. 890. The object in front of the bust looks like a closed 
umbrella. There was probably an inscription to tight and left 
of the upper field, but this is off the coin. 
No. 20. An intaglio probably in agate, of good artistic 
execution. The male figure is nude except for a waist-cloth, 
and carries a bow and arrow. To the right is a Kharoshthi 
legend which I read as Sagavatigasa. 
he reverse sides of Coins Nos. 11 to 19, with the excep- 
tion of No. 12, are of the usual Sassanian type. 
R. B. WurteHzapD. 
123. Tar Oxpsst British MURSHIDABAD RUPEE. 
A most difficult problem has always been to distinguish 
the native-fashioned Murshidabad rupees into three series = 
lst—those coined at Murshidabad by the Nawab of Bengal ; 
2nd—the same coined under British control ; and 
3rd—those struck at Calcutta by the Company; all three 
sets bearing the mint-name Murshidabad. 
The latest contribution to this question is, so far I am 
aware, a paper of Mr. H. N. Wright in J.A.S.B. 1904 (Num. 
Suppl. No. 28) which can be resumed as follows :— ae 
(a) Between 1171 and 1176 a.m. the Company's Mint a 
m . 
Murshidabad rupees, did not 
- it seems that no coins were 
bad during this year. 
poses a new riddle ; 
