200 Journ. of the Asiat. Soc. of Bengal. [July & Aug., 195. 
[After seeing my explanations eae , p. 14) Mn 
Beveridge wrote on November 12th, 1914:] oi ‘accept your 
view that ‘Abdullah Khan is the great ‘Abdullah Khan, | 
also agree with ve that the Looe aaa who behaved trea 
a my Babur fled from Samarkand, because he could not 
help himself, and did not sik his Master of the Horse a | 
any body else to keep it for 
P. 672,—In an earlier DN ieassau of p. 672 Monserrate speaks 
of ‘Umar Shaikh’s having been succeeded by a certain Khio 
Mirza. This also is quite incorrect.' 
Fr. Monserrate forgot t ge this pr peri pit elaine which he ye iin 
sentence a little lower. prs rent speaks . se at ‘Abdullah in 
Account of Akbar (cf. J.A.S.B., 1912, pp. 190, As Babs 
As for the Khan-khanan who behaved treacherously towards 
(p. 650), I do not see that Monserrate allu to ram Khan. S# foll 
Index, s. v. Beyramcanus. Bairém Khan is petucron. to only be right 
7b. 4, and 118a. 1, 2, @.e., p.651, where notice his name m wie 
ma: im it is said only that *« Persae virtute, 
legiones ducebat, omnia coercuit.’’—‘‘ At Persa....--- Ad 
speaks of Bairam Khan’s treachery to — ast bee 
Cancanus” of Pe 650 and 672 is and andson wi 
different person. His so n (p. 672) was babonuneeauee his gre ; 
Hosacors, whoever they were.—H. H. 672 of fol 
! About Khan Mirza’s succeeding ‘Umar Shaikh (cf. P- neertatl 
» 4, and fos aeaneen nol db n. 4), there is a mistake! in 
bes there a curio 3 as well in some of the royal sare in 
A se Saal sabliahed. ee posta by Ji Paine : amshedji M sate 
ten at the veo Fn Pag Bombay, Bom y Education ar; the? 
2: Lt ai 
Shah, ee Me irza, 4. A 
te 6. Babur, 7. Boma. 8. Akbar (in the centre). with 
with Blochmann’s list, in Ain Akbari, I, table at end of voll ae 
a seal i Edw. Terry, A Voyage to East India, London, 
pp. 348-49, Meh plas before a “ Valenty2> 
But, we may compare this with a seal of mete sin V find! 
Oud en Nieuw Oost-Indien, i Deel, 2de Stuk, th posh a abor® | 
* ing d 
ape: = neg g . 
Miran Shah, 3. Abii Sa‘id, ‘ nner Mir, 5. Mahmid, 6. B yee 
yin, 8. Akbar, 9. Jahangir, 10. Shah Jahan, 11. Aurangzeb (in th 
Compare with’ Tavernier (‘Ball's edn.), I, 3 Akbar (P 62 
onserrate p the followin alogy up to ‘i,t 
. 673 n. 4, Ist sentence): 1. Timur. 2, Miran y Bbah, 2 ai 
Umar Shaikh, 5. Khan Mirza, 6. Babu, “f Humay an, 8. 4k 
