932 Journ. of the Asiat. Soc. of Bengal. [J uly & Aug., 1915. 
mistaken reading—see below—this mint should be deleted, and 
the column devoted to Maminabad. The only entry is Shah 
> Alam II, 4, P. M. 
ig 476. For Chitor, read Chitor. 
P. 478. For Hisar, ‘read Hisar. 
P. 484. For Deogarh, read Deogarh. 
— P, 487. Column Satara, MR, line 8, delete T. This iss 
clerical error. 
P. 490. At head of first column, interchange & ani 
A. 
4 491. Qanauj should precede Kabul. 
. 493. For Sitpir, read Sitpir. Also Sitpur should 
Zulli Sahrind 
P. 494. Sikakul should succeed saves and Sitpiur. 
496. For ‘Azimabad, read ‘Azim 
P. 505. On this page is the senate ‘Kiratpir, which 
on page 429 is written Kiratpfir. One of these is an error, bat 
I should like to see the coin before deciding which is the correct 
rendering. 
P. 510. There is a reference to a Gohad copper coin of 
Akbar. This is a pure clerical error, and should be deleted. 
P. 517. For sb} ie@e Mustafa-abad, read ou! 
Mustafa-abad. : 
P. 523. On p. 429 I have mentioned Nahan mint as bell 
somewhat doubtful though included, but by inadvertence have 
omitted it from the actual Tables. ‘One of the vacant coll 
should be devoted to Nahan mint, which should really follow 
Nagor. The only entry is Shah ‘Alam II, #, R(1)- 
CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS. 
P, 429. For Bikanir, read Bikane as 
. 43: remarks on the Acie mint now req 
XXI of the second volume of the new Lahore Museum 
Catalogue. A reproduction of the Sagittarius muhar ® 
bearing the name of Nir Jahan, of the Lahor mint, is aes! 
the same Plate. I wrote that this was the only know? zodi 8 
coin struck at Lahor mint. But I find that a Capra 
rupee struck at Lahor, dated 1036a.H., is in Be 
Vv 
aTvan. Dr. G. P. Taylor tas paeslet acquit 
a dim of Akbar of year 985 a.n., Shick bears the full ” 
name of Anharwala Pattan 
