$28 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengol. (Sept. , 1915. 
ments, A, B, and C. A has 24 folios, with normally 7 lines to 
a page. B has folios numbered 29, but really 30, the figure 13 
aving been repeated on folio 14. C has 29 folios. B and © 
g 
contents of 29a to 30b in B have been again written in C, la to 
34. The contents are otherwise continuous. 
The context shows that it is a running commentary on 
the Mimamsa-sutras of Jaimini. The MS. is a fragment 
extending only up to the end of the fourth foot of the third 
Adhyaya out of twelve Adhyayas. 
The MS. mentions Halayudha nowhere. The colophons 
at the end of each pada name the work generally as Mimamsa- 
éastra-sarvvasva. Only once, at the end of the second pada 
of the third Adhyaya, the work has been named Mimamsa- 
rovasva.! 
Kathaka and the Satapatha-brahmana, and the names of some 
sects, Sankhya-yoga-panhcaratra-pasupata-Sakya-N irgrantha-nir- 
mitani Dharma-sastr-abhasani, the MS. mentions specially the 
Bhasya and the Bhasya-kara (on Jaimini’s siitras), the Varttika, 
and the Varttikara-kara (Kumarila), and Mandana. Amons 
smrti-writers I find the smartah, Manu, and what is more 
interesting the smrti work of a Panini, Panini-smrtth (B fol. 46). 
Among later works only one has been found, the Nyaya-raina- 
kara (Iti tad-vyakhyayam Nydya-ratnakarah, A fol. 38) of 
arama Misra. The Acaryah are mentioned several 
imes 
es. 
_ The Benares College Library catalogue shows @ MS. named 
Mimamsa-sarvvasva. examination I found the name t0 be 
a mistake. The MS. is a fragment without beginning OF sa! 
only 20 folios existing. The folios are in a bad state, tora and 
decayed, some already crumbled at the right-hand side, Una 
folio marked 28 (b), one colophon can be traced, fa 
fetta spaqrrq zataqe:| So this work appears to be — 
commentary on Jaimini’s sitras and has been thus confounded 
with the Mimamsa-sarvvasva. In fact on the top of 
folio the name had been correctly entered as Siddhania-sar 
vasva, but another hand added by its side M imamsa-sarvoase) 
a mistake which was copied in the catalogue. 
ti. The Vaisnava-sarvvasva. 
_ No MS. of this work has yet been found, and no reference 
to it can be traced in the later smrti literature. 
Loe” 
1 Ind. Govt. MS. No. 583, A. fol. 66, @taTeTat of 
feat: We 0 Clea, <fa datersse eaters [ feat] we 
This MS. is noticed in R. Mittra’s No. 1507. 
a Ne ne ee 
