~ Vol, XI, No. 9.] The Hist. of Smrti in Bengal and Mithila. 345 
[WV.S.] 
iii. Three works ending in the word candrika or moon-light, 
the Acara-candrika, the Sraddha-candrika, the Dana- 
candrika. 
iv. ht works ending in the word dipika or eaciubahias, 
e Gudha-dipika, and the Sraddha-dipika. 
v. Three works ending in the word Viveka or discussion, 
the Durg-otsava-viveka, the Prayascitta-viveka and 
the Suddhi-viveka. 
I. The Commentaries. 
These call for little remarks. In the Daya-bhaga-tippani 
besides occasional references to Prakasa-krt, the only late 
reference I have found is to Kullika, whose opinion he criticizes. ! 
rinatha’s commentary was in turn much criticized by Acyuta- 
nanda Cakravartti in his pasicie td ade ce Daya-bhaga-siddhanta- 
tumuda-candrika (see me Appendix A 
rinatha’s commentary on se well-known Sraddha- 
viveka of Siilapani® is fuller of late aecuinta, among which 
may be mentioned the— 
Kalpa-tarw (10 times). Parisista-prakasa (6). 
Kamadhenu (2). | Paraskara-bhasya-kara (2). 
Giatamani-ket (1). | Bhima-parakrama (1). 
Jikan _ Madana-parijata (3) 
Ji vera (2). | Mahar voip ima (3). 
Tithi-viveka (1). | Mitaksara (1). 
Piya-bhiga-krt (2). Varddhamanopadbysye (3). 
_ Dharmesvera a (4). Sraddha-kalpa (4). 
Nara ee eahyaye (5). Sraddtha- Bitsy ka (2). 
linea: Siromani’s ed. of the Dayabhagis, p- 80 (1 45): — Tea 
Wau 7 fantercfeicfa HEAATTTS | This criticism fixes the lower 
limit of Kulliika Bhatta, of Manu-samhita, as older than 
8d, 4), = (1. wntid br ea 29), 54 
(I, ee te t Siromani ’s ed., 8 ( 
, TL 6 5 89 5 lot II. cbse h such re: ks as tan-na, 
ai pi tend stip ot ib par ya «(tL alocana-vz ce omen ieubiel, tad- 
Pee Vor Acyess tti see the Appe 
tug 2 Sans. Coll Sanda Cakr “The page no. on its last folio is 84, but as 
ios, 
ang f folios would be 94. Itis written in two hands, hes smaller 
the aie @ little larger. 
