362 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. [Sept., 1915. 
APPENDIX A. 
(Page 35). 
ACYUTA CAKRAVARTTI. 
He is ones connected with the family of Srinatha as a 
rival. Hew 
(i) The SWeithd vote. evant No MS. as yet found. 
Quoted in his Daya-bhaga-tika.! It would seem to 
Hate been a rival commentary to that of Srinatha, 
probably criticizing the latter work. 
(ii) The Diya-bhaga-siddhanta-kumuda-candrika’, a com- 
mentary on the Déaya-bhaga, also a rival to that of 
Srinatha which it Giticines at several places, and 
which was defended in some instances by Rama 
phadra. It does not appear to be inferior to 
Srinatha’s, has been quoted by another commentator 
Mahesvara Bhattacarya and was largely used in the 
better known Srikrsna Tarkalankara’s taka. 
quotes the usual later Na Kullika Bhatta 
(once), Prakaga-kara (once), the M: adana-parijata 
(once), the Mitaksara haat aeoaar the Ratnakara 
idee times), Stlapaini (once), and Halayudha 
(iii) The "Sandarbha-siitikd, a commentary on Aniruddha 
Bhat Hara-lata,? being the oldest known conr 
mietibary on that work. It quotes, among others, 
the 
Karm- opadesini (1). | Mitaksara (6). 
Karma-pradipa. Mitaksara-kava (1). 
Kubera (1). Migrah (11). 
Govindaraja (1). Medhatithi (1). 
Caturbhuja (1). Ratnakara (5). 
imita-vahana (1) (from the | Ratnakara-kara (1)- 
Diya-bhaga). _ Rudradhara (5) 
Nariyav-opidhyaya (9). _ Varddhamana (1). 
Nilambara (1). Vacaspati Misra (1). 
Parisista-prakasa (1). Silapani (2). 
Sania - is Harihara (1). 
r-caranah (4). adri (1). 
Prakasa-kara, (1). pie sea 
she a 
1 Bharat Siromani’s ed., p. 44 (1.37), q@qaame 
\ , 
yI. 142. 
n Bh. Siromani’s ed. In R. Mittra, Notices: - 
(MS. co cn Dither hat ta-kumuada-—candrika has been neds 
intand of of A hoe final colophon to Mahamahopadhy aya Ram 
8 Sans. Coll MS., a2, 31%, 
| 
| 
! 
. 
