430 Journ. of the Asiat. Soc. of Bengal. [Nov. & Dec., 1915. 
of this Se Gadadhara, a MS. of Bhojadeva’s Vividha- 
vidya-vicara-catura was copied on Friday Sravana vadi 1 of 
La. sam. 372: and a MS. of the Dana-kanda of the Kriya-kalpa- 
taru was copied i in Saka 1426 and La. sam 374 Karttika sukla 5 
This king has been wrongly identified by Professor Bendall 
with Ramasimhadeva of the Karnata dynasty.* 
15. LAKSMINATHADEVA. 
This king’s relation to Ramabhadradeva cannot be traced 
in any authentic records. According to tradition he was the 
us 
Kamsa-narayana. Under his patronage, Harapats Agaméacarya 
compiled the Tantric work Mantra-pradipa 
Harapati was son of Rucipati ahs a) been penn 
by Bhairavendra, and so Laksminatha cannot be 
time from that king. A Maithila MS. of the Devi- mahatngate 
was copied during his reign on Wednesday, La. sar 392 Pausa 
Mrccatd 3,or pple, 1510 a.p.* So this king was ruling at least 
inl hades 
Laksm ninBtha evidently came into collision with the power- 
ful Sultan Sikandar Lodi of Delhi. In the peace concluded 
1 Nopal Notices, p. 05: —gwganfe aercranfyxraracgar cage: 
WRITE Ahywefatfefentis geatafa | wd aor) BAT 
afe yam alcaytaat | Ind. Govt. MS. 4026, fol. 13la:—epg o8 
aifia wie 38 Sistema seasiiner fect + + (rar)? Ae 
wa aga fafaais geatata i 
WI twee | Then (at the end) aq eqMaazay qqvantfys WATT- 
ata afiangenreai theag [un] Both the MSS. were written by the 
same copyist, Subhapati. 
2 The History of Nepal by C. Bendall, J.A.S.B., 1903, 
19. 
8 The alanine: aie R. Mitra, Not way 34-5), introd. verse 4 
hi the onus rar ahs pa ( itra, Notices, pp. ) 
ata 
VATIAy AGS: aT F Ras fatwz | 
wasald ga yee vgeveeteapilhelag nCen] 
Tts final colophon -—<fa aaerfmattax frautaqUaarel 
a... nen ce Si aa em se 7 t- 
‘ AIST T UH SM ITAA TS EAT TTT aa 
=' > Se Fans iv — 
senisirererentereete eine 
* Nepal Notices, p. 63, final colophon :— 
WH Ree ote aS ga aercrenfycrrtaaarcreETTTETG....-- 
aiezaate fefere gata | 
a a Ne 
a 
