248 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. (July, 1909. 
Visnu. To the left is the goddess Sarasvati, vind in hand; and to 
the right Laksmi with a lotus stalk in her hand, and above her head 
the two hands of Visnu, one holding the gud@ and the other a lotus, 
The ruins of Panduaéh have otherwise been fully discussed and 
illustrated by Dr. Blochmann. I publish a photograph of the ex- 
wish expressed by that scholar.! In a paper read at a recent meet- 
ing of the Society, Babu Manmohan Chakravarti, M.A., B.L., has 
Deokot in the north. This fact is further emphasised by the 
tion on the southern mihrab of the mosque at Triveni clearly 
: ee 
sioniicee gone Fain, Malar nse Re 
SnGeE Oe POOR | slavishad, tpeasure on... tha. teeeah),” 
The date of this inscription is A.H. 698, i.e, 1298 A.D. Thus 
tion also mentions one Nasir Muhammad, alias Burhan Qazi 
to us from the Kursinama cf the Mutwallis as Barkhan Ghazi. 
This Barkhan Ghazi seems to be a Apabhramsa of Burhan Qazi. 
If the date of the conquest of Satganw is correct, then the 
Mahomedan Gover- Kaikaus Shah of Bengal 
nors of Satganw. the Emperor Ghiasuddin Balban. Zafar 
of the expedition, and he became the Governor of the conquered 
province. Zafar i 
of Deokot. This is known from the Gan arampur inscription of 
a 
Humay in, Zafar Khan Bahram Itgin. This inscription was 
incised just a year before the Triveni inscription (A. H. 697).* 
Zafar Khan 1298. Z8far Khan was alive in 1313 A.D. 
131 This is known from an inscription now 
3 A.D. 
: es hie stuck on the tomb of Burhan Qaziat Tri- 
veni. This inscription states that a Madrasah was built by Khan 
Muhammad Zafar Khan, the supporter of Kings and Sovereigns, 
and titles are given in the Dinajpur inscription, Ulugh i A’zam 
I dl 
1 J.A.8.B., pt. i., 1870, p, 300, 2 J.A,S.B., pt. i., 1872, p. 103. 
