Vol. V, No. 8.] Numismatic Supplement. 329 
[N.S.] 
Obverse. Reverse, 
csi wy) 
xl a 7 gb 
al le os! 
xl a ~ pps &ino 
Th} 9 aS ad 
tt 
Zafar[abad], lst year, 
1119 H. 
On the specimen now in my possession the arrangement ot 
the Reverse legend differs slightly from the above, inasmuch as 
the oa} ai stands not to the right but to the left of (»sle, also 
in the lowest line no trace is to be seen of the two ’Alifs. But 
in all other respects the two specimens are precisely alike. 
trom Mr. Rodgers’s attribution of this coin to the Zafara- 
bad mint, it is clear that he read the reverse legend thus :— 
obT ab wy cpio cpl dal ado 
Now the combination of merely the two words (alo Carle 
is, so far as I can learn, otherwise unknown, and it is, moreover, 
are unile 8B Ula oat ai 
struck at...... the year 1 of the accession (reign) associated 
with victory. The lowest line is thus assumed to contain the 
name, as yet unknown, of the mint: and it was, of course, just 
the lowest line of the reverse that in the large majority of the 
later Mughal coins was reserved for the mint-name. 
Guo. P. Taytor. 
Ahmadabad ; 20-1-1909. 
68. THe MucHat Mint OF GOKULGARH. 
The ruined fort of Gokulgarh is situated two miles to the 
north of RewAri, a fairly important junction on the Rajputana- 
Malwa Railway in the Gurgaon District of the South-East 
Punjab. 
_ Thé town of Rewiri itself is of great antiquity. Tradition 
assigns its original foundation to Raja K Pal son of 
