Vol. V, a 8.] . Numismatic Supplement. 333 
[V.S.] 
and Ahsanabad. In the earlier examples of the Aurangabad 
jalus 22). Similarly in a mohur of Ahmadnagar dated jalus 14, 
the name of the mint is at the top of the coin. Later specimens 
exhibit the name at the bottom (earliest date 1098). The name 
‘Alamgirpur also occurs in both places. Khanbayat is at the 
top of a coin dated regnal year one. When the spelling is 
changed to Kanbayat the mint occurs at the bottom of the coin 
(earliest date 1082, jalus 14). The mohurs of Daru-z-Zafr 
Bijapir exhibit two distinct styles 
ut of at least two hun ane mohurs of Mustagqirru-1- Khilafat 
Akbarabad, one only had se) in the couplet (date 1097), 
the rest having pic ,¢~ (earliest date 1099). Coins exhibiting 
both versions of the couplet were found of Strat, of Kabul, 
and of Daru-l-Mulk Kabul. There are mohurs of both Gul. 
barga and Ahsanabad. The gold coins of Daru-s-Saltanat 
Lahore appear to be new. At least fifteen were found. The 
selected specimens range from 1097 to 1118, and are of the 
usual type, the name of the mint coming at the top. The 
three selected mohurs of Murshidabad are all of 49 jalus date. 
There are gold coins of Ujjain (1105 A.H.), and of Daru-l-Fath 
Ujjain (1112). The ‘square areas’ type of Jahangirnagar 
mentioned by Mr. Nelson Wright (I.M.C.) is represented by 
ree specimens of jalus years 14 and 15. 
There are three mohurs apparently of 
§ ‘ 
cae Shah ‘Alam Bahadur I bearing the follow- 
ing inscription :— 
Obverse. Reverse. 
git * is e ny cer be Cuyle 
rH ahene 
phe Gity5 asad! prime 
waldo da} si— 
Eerie ue Oa wy? 
(Probably aS yl ) olf pst 
They are coins of Sahib Qiran Bahadur ‘Alamgir Sani, 
struck at Mustaqirru-l-Khilafat, Akbaribad, in 1119 (jalus one), 
and resemble silver coin No. 3, on p. 220 of C. J. Ro 
erroneously attributed by Mr. Rodgers to ‘Alamgir II, and is 
a coin a Shih ‘Alam Bahadur I. 
mohur of Mustaqirru-l- Khilafat, Akbarabad, the name 
is at sey bottom of the coin, dated 1119, jalus 1. The mint of 
