Vol. V, No. 9.] Numismatic Supplement. 389 
[N.S.] 
venture to hazard merely from my inability to suggest any 
adequate reason why Bidar so late as 1757 A.D. (1171 A.H.)— 
thus some thirty-three years after its inclusion in the Haidarabad 
State—should be striking coins in the name of the feeble Mughal 
Emperor ‘Alam gir II. 
Geo. P. TAYLor. 
ee New eee OS RO 
