NORTH AMERICAN EUCOSMINAE. 99 



Male genitalia of type figured. 



Alar expanse. — 13-16 mm. 



Type. — In collection Barnes. 



Paratypes. — Cat. No. 24807 U.S.N.M. Also in American Museum 

 and collection Barnes. 



Type locality. — Southern Pines, North Carolina. 



Food plant. — Unknown. 



Described from male type and 13 male and 4 female j^aratypes, 

 nil from Doctor Barnes's collection, collected at Southern Pines 

 (June 1 to July 23). There is also in the National Museum a small 

 (11 mm.) rubbed male of this species collected by Doctor Dyar at 

 Skyland, Virginia, July 15, 1911. 



43. EUCOSMA PALLIDIPALPANA Kearfott. 



(Fig. 227.) 



Eiicosma paUidlpnliKDia Keakfott, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 28, 1905, p. 353. — 

 Barnes and IMcDunnough, Check List Lepicl. Bor. Amer., no. 6920, 1917. 



Male genitalia figured from typical specimen in National Collec- 

 tion collected at Washington, District of Columbia, July, 1901 

 (Busck). 



Distribution according to specimens in National Collection, Amer- 

 ican Museum, and collection Barnes: Virginia. District of Columbia, 

 North Carolina, Connecticut, Iowa. 



Alar expanse. — 9-13.5 mm. 



Type. — In American Museum. 



Type locality. — Washington, District of Columbia. 



Food plant. — Unknown. 



44. EUCOSMA PERDRICANA (Walsingham). 



(Fig. 205.) 



Paedisca perdricana Walsingham, lllxis. Lepid. Heter. Bi-it. Mus., vol. 4, 1879, 



p. 49. 

 Eucosma perdricana Fernald, in Dyar List N. Amer. Lepid., no. 5102, 1903. — 



Barnes and McDunnough, Check List Lepid. Bor. Amer., no. 6934, 1917. 

 Eucosma kandana Kearfott. Trans. Anier. Ent. Soc, vol. 33, 1907, p. 20. — 



Barnes and McDunnough, Check List Lepid. Bor. Amer., no. 6911, 1917. 

 Eucosma argillacea Meyrick, Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. 48, 1912, p. 34. 



Kearfott 's type and cotypes of kandana answer in every detail 

 Walsingham's description of perdricaTUX; and I have no hesitation in 

 listing it as a synonym. Aside from the specimens determined as 

 kandana., there are no specimens that could be applied to Walsing- 

 ham's name in the National Collection or either of the two other 

 collections. The specimen in the American Museum determined by 

 Kearfott as perdricana Walsingham is much too large for that 

 species. 



