510 UNIVERSITY OF VIHGINIA PUBLICATIONS 



(5) W'ildermann, 1909. Concerning the temperature coefficient of reaction velocity — 



argument as in (4) above. Zeitschrift fiir physikalische Chemie, l.xvi, 445. 



(6) Ericson-Auren and Palmaer, 1906. Rate of solution of dolomite and marble 



in acids are not the same — hence, it is claimed that the diffusion theory 

 of reaction velocity can not be correct. Zeitschrift fur physikalische 

 Chemie, Ivi, 701. 



(7) Marc, 1909. Shows that the rate of crystalization for certain salts is not the 



same as rate of solution — Argument against the diffusion theory of reaction 

 velocity. Zeitschrift fiir physikalische Chemie, Ixvii, 500. 



(8) Marc, 1909. Same argument as in (7) and (4). Zeitschrift fiir physikalische 



Chemie, Ixvii, 487. 



(9) Wildermann, 1909. (Work done in 1896). Claims to have advanced the same 



formula used by Nernst for heterogeneous reactions in 1896. Denies the 

 validity of the diffusion theory of reaction velocity. Shows that the for- 

 mula is independent of this theory. Attacks the theory violently. Report 

 of British Association for 1896, also in Zeitschrift fiir physikalische Chemie, 

 XXX, 348, 1899. 



(10) Schiikarew, 1891. Worked with various metals in acids and halogens. Showed 



that all dissolved at approximately the same rate, i.e., in terms of chemical 

 equivalents. Seems to' have been the first to explicitly make this state- 

 ment. Work not of a very high order of accuracy. Zeitschrift fiir physik- 

 alische Chemie, viii, 75. 



(11) Brunner, 1905. Determined the rate of solution of zinc in acids and in iodine. 



Work similar to that of Schiikarew. . Zeitschrift fiir physikalische Chemie, 

 li, 99. 



(12) Van Name and Edgar, 1910. Detailed and exact work showing that Ag, Cu, 



Zn, Hg, and Cd, dissolve at very nearly the same rate in iodine of a given 

 concentration. Also showing that the reaction velocity increased as the 

 concentration of the KI increases. American Journal of Science, xxix, 

 237. Also Zeitschrift fiir physikalische Chemie, Ixxvii, 97. 



(13) Van Name and Bosworth, 1911. An extension of the work done by Van Name 



and Edgar — Using several metals»other than those used by Van Name and 

 Edgar. See (12) above. American Journal of Science, xxxii, 207. 



(14) Van Name and Hill, 1914. Relation of thickness of the unstirred layer to the 



viscosity change caused by adding non-electrolytes — viz., sugar and 

 alcohol. Zeitschrift fiir physikalische Chemie, Ixxxv, 289. Also American 

 Journal of Science, January, 1914. 



(15) Arrehenius, 1892. Effect of added non-electrolytes on diffusion, and hence on 



reaction velocity. Zeitschrift fiir physikalische Chemie, x, 51. 



(16) Nernst, 1911. Formula for the diffusion of electrolytes, viz.: 



D = 0.4485 =^^ j 1 -I- 0.0034 {t - 18) [ 



Theoretical Chemistry — English edition, 373. 



(17) Nernst, 1911. Transport numbers for K, and other common ions. Theoretical 



Chemisti'y — English translation, 366. 



(18) Bredig, 1894. Transport number for I3 stated to be 44.1. Zeitschrift fiir 



physikalische Chemie, xiii, 232. 



