178 CORALLINACEAE 
PLATE 57, FIGURES 0-16. Leptocladia peruviana 
9. A portion of two adjacent lobes of the thallus, showing marginal appendages and 
innovations. 
то, II. Арісев of marginal teeth, showing apical and surface cells. 
I2. Outline of tion of a thall t, showing position and elevation of the 
nemathecia. 
. Tetraspores, illustrating various types of arrangement in the sporangium. 
14. Outlines of cross sections through thallus segments. 
I5. A similar section near base, showing a pronounced costa. 
16. A portion of a cross section of the thallus, showing medullary hyphae, the central 
axis, two opposite branches from it, etc. 
АП of the figures are drawn from the type material (Bay of Sechura, Coker 175 
292). Figures 9, 14, and 15 are enlarged 9 diameters; 12, 16 diameters; 16, 245 
diameters; то and тт, 345 diameters; 13, 390 diameters. 
PLATE 66. Leptocladia peruviana 
Photograph of the type specimen (Coker 157 p-p.—dried), natural size. 
Family CORALLINACEAE 
CORALLINA L. p.p. Syst. Nat. 1: 805. 1759. [ed. 10) 
CORALLINA OFFICINALIS L. loc. cit. Kiitz. Tab. Phyc. 8: 32, 33: 
bl. 66-08. 1858. Yendo, Jour. Coll. Sci. Tokyo 16:—(28) 
pl. 7. f. 10-13. 1902; Setch. & Gard. Univ. 
California Publ. Bot. 1: 364-367. 
1903 
Corallina chilensis Decaisne; Harv. Ner. Austral. 103. 1849. 
Corallina. officinalis chilensis Kütz. Tab. Phyc. 8: 32. pl. 66. f. 1. 
1858. Yendo, Minn. Bot. Stud. 2: 718. pl. 54. f. 1. 1902. 
Corallina vancouveriensis Yendo, loc. cit. 719. pl. 54. f. 3; Bl. 55+ 
f. 1, 2; pl. 56. f. 16, 17. 1902. 
Corallina aculeata Yendo, loc. cit. 720. pl. 55. f. 3; pl. 56. f. 18, 19 
From drift on the beach, Pisco, July 7, 1908, Coker 465 2?» 
also collected at Pisco by Dr. H. H. Rusby in March, 1885 (no. 282, 
in herb. Columbia University as C. chilensis). 
The name Corallina chilensis Decaisne seems to have been 
originally intended for certain specimens collected by Сау at 
San Carlos de Chiloe in January, 1836, and now preserved in the | 
herbarium of the Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle at Paris. Harveyes 
however, appears to have been the first to publish a diagnosis a x 
the species, in doing which he cites “Dne. in Herb. Paris. ined. 
but takes occasion to remark that specimens from Valparaiso 
