348 AstTER History; Bock 
Bauhin there calls Chamaemelum eranthemum,* and his editors 
endorse as also the Chamaemelum aureum of many. This plant 
was the “ Chamaemelum.aureum peregrinum capitulo sine folus” 
of Bauhin’s Ast, 2: 119, where it is described in full, but 
without synonyms earlier than Clusius’ translation of Dodoens, 
1557. Linnaeus recognized it as a congeries of species, his Ava- 
cyclus aureus, Cotula aurea and part of his Anthemis nobilis being 
its equivalents. 
Bock uses the following Aster names : 
1. Aster, sed non Aster Atticus = his Uva lupina, Paris quad- 
rifolia L. 
2. Aster Atticus flore medio luteo = Azthemis nobilis L., ete. 
3. Asterion = Cannabis sativa L.; “to Cannabis the name 
Asterion also belongs,” Bock. 
4. Asterion = Marrubium album L.; which, says Bock, “ may 
be the Asterion of Pausanias.”’ 
5. Tinctorius flos primus = Aster Atticus, fide C. Bauhin, 2. ¢., 
Aster Amellus L. Perhaps Bock also included in it Anthems 
tinctoria L. 
6. Tinctorius flos alter = Erigeron acre L., the Amellus mon- 
Zanus of Colonna. 
7. Tinctorius flos iii = /nuda spiraeifolia L. = Aster cony zoides 
of Gesner, some say, = Aster Atticus alter of Caesalpino, Aster 
montanus of Lobel, Aster 5 of C. Bauhin. 
8. Tinctorius flos iv = Chrysanthemum segetum L. 
LXIX. Fucus 
Leonhard Fuchs,+ the third and youngest of the “ Fathers of 
Botany,” completed, with Bock and Brunfels, the trio of workers from 
nature who mark the beginnings of the modern spirit in botany. 
He was himself the first to print an identification of the Aster Atti 
ctl 
* C} oe * 
] 
leads far astray from the ae 
an 
chamomiles ; to Dodoens and Gesner it gle Adonis vernalis L.; to Fu chs it me 
orm Chamomilla) for most of the species so called by his contempora ee 
led chamomiles to-day; he named at least four so; but this fifth cbamot 
ve 
furt, 1512, distinguished himself in the Gotselay ules in Greek and Latin pe ; 
went in 1519 to Ingolstadt, where he took his doctorate in 1524 and soon, learn! 
