103 



differences without 

 answer may be to el 

 At 1 eas t un t i 1 they 

 compromise that wil 



I support S. 1 

 adoption of a manag 

 Recreation Area tha 

 nonmotorized river 

 purposes . " 



Th i s bill is n 

 intent of Congress 

 was est ab 1 i shed . 



1 support the 

 reasonable limits o 

 H.C.N.R.A. as a fin 



1 do not suppo 

 class of user group 

 another user group, 

 designating public 



jeopardizing the public right of access, the 

 iminatc all commercial operations in the area. 



can sit down and work out a suitable 

 1 not impact the private sector. 

 374 and H.R. 2568, "A BILL To require 

 ement plan for the Hells Canyon National 

 t allows appropriate us of motorized and 

 craft in the recreation area, and for other 



ot new legislation, but merely clarifies the 

 when the Hells Canyon National Recreation Ares 



right of the U. S. Forest Service to set 

 n any, or all, user groups within the 

 al means of control. 



rt the concept of eliminating one particular 

 to enhance the experience, or profit, of 

 Congress must not get into a trend of 

 recreation areas for exclusive use only. 



Respectfully submitted 



Richard G. Sherwin 



