116 



-8- 



the most important wildlife habitats. The loss of wildlife 

 populations in these areas would greatly exceed that 

 suggested by the percentage reduction in area. In some 

 cases (i.e. Chichagof Island), the proposal illustrates very 

 poor habitat manaqement for wildlife. Under this revised 

 proposal, the areas would not provide abundant, stable 

 wildlife populations for the subsistence and recreational 

 users of the areas. 



If you have any questions, please contact me or Lana Shea. 



cc: Frank Rue 

 Lana Shea 

 Dave Anderson 

 Rob Bosworth 

 Scott Marshall 

 Fred Gaffney 



