142 



contrast, the NMFS buffer strip policy is simple, enforceable, and is based on existing, 

 verifiable maps and information. 



Both Forest Service riparian prescriptions grant agency field personnel the discretion to deviate 

 from prescription sta ndards on a site bv site basis. 



Below every single table specifying allowable activities along Tongass streams is the following 

 disclaimer 



Timber harvest guidelines may vary, based on site specific analysis, in order to meet 

 process group objectives." 



In many cases, even where class 1 streams are concerned, the Forest Service states: 



"Incidental cutting of trees may be allowed in areas not programmed for harvest on a 

 case-by-case basis." 



In other words. Forest Service administrators may depart from the riparian prescriptions at any 

 time whenever they believe it is justified. This is exactly the sort of inconsistent enforcement 

 of salmon habitat protection standards that has eroded the public's faith in case-by-case Forest 

 Service management. 



Attachment L is a point by point review of the AMS Summary, "Understanding the Past . . . 

 Designing the Future." As you will note, this "user friendly" document is a blantant attempt to 

 deceive the public and the U.S. Congress. 



The problems of the Tongass were created by political decisions and the failure of the Forest 

 Service to honor its commitments. Congress must get management of the Tongass back on 

 track by passing reform legislation. Legislation would solve many of the immediate Tongass 

 issues, stop the elimination of the remaining high volume old-growth forests, and allow the 

 Forest Service the freedom to develop a comprehensive plan within the framework of the 

 reforms. 



22 



