V r ol. X, No. 5.1 Numismatic Supplement No. XXII. 197 



[N.S.] 



were among these, but the following appear to be unrecorded 

 dates :— Muhammad Shah bin Humayun (B.M.C. Xo. 474)— 869 

 and 870 (1st size), for the second size of the same 877, and 

 Kallm-ullah (F. J.Thanawala. Xum.Supp. No. XI, No. 12)— 933. 

 The coins of Kallm-ullah and Wali-ullah were in particularly 

 good preservation. The coins have been distributed among 

 the various Indian Museums. 



C. J. Brown. 



130. On Four Rare Mughal Coins 



[With Plate VII]. 

 1. Shah 'Alam Bahadur. 

 K Obverse. 



Mint A'zamnagar t_c}'- e 



Date 4 R. *• ~- v 



Wt, 173 yX$ fJU Ij 



S. -95 *< — ■ 



Reverse . 



u-y u 



M 



l^Jk-C 



*± 



ji.'i >Jait e u-^=!- 



J* LUCKNOW MUSEUM 



This is the first A'zamnagar coin published of Bahadur. 

 It conforms to the type of rupees of Aurangzeb and Farrukh- 

 siyar of this mint with the exception of the last line on the 

 reverse which is quite unlike that on the Aurangzeb coin pub- 

 lished by Mr. Whitehead (Num. Suppl. xv, 89, No. 10) or the 

 Farrukhsiyar rupee published by Dr. Taylor (N. S. xiv, 84, 

 No. 11). For the latter coin Dr. Taylor suggests Gokulgarh, 

 and this reading is supported by No. 3 in this article. But 

 in the present coin I see no resemblance to this name. The 

 figure t*. though indistinct in the cast, can be read without 

 difficulty on the coin. The provenance of the coin was Lar- 

 khana District, Sind, and was acquired in 1912. 



