LIST or NEUEO;PTEBA IK BEITISH MUSEUM. 269 



C. ATTENUATA, p. 242, 14= C. attcnuata, Walker. 



C. THORACiCA, p. 243, 15= C. thoracica, Walker. The example shows 

 no trace of the rufous streak on each side of the antennae mentioned 

 by Hagen in ' Neurop. N. America.' 



C. ALBA, p. 243, 16= C. alba, L. 



C. REPLETA, p. 244, 17= C. repleta, Walker. 



C. HYBRiDA, p. 245, 20= C. ? Not hybrida of Schneider. 



C. 4-puNCTATA, p. 246, 22, is wanting, nor is there any pin-hole to 

 indicate that it has ever been there. 



C. INFECTA, p. 246, 23= C. infecta, Newm. Labro antice paulo emar- 

 ginato ; belongs to another section. 



C. ciNCTA, p. 247, 24= C cincta, Schnd. 



C. NiGRicosTATA, p. 250, 34, Wanting. 



C. 7-PUNCTATA, p. 251, 36= C. 1 -punctata, Wesm. 



C. INTERMEDIA, p. 252, 40= C. intermedia, Schnd. (from Santarem). 

 The one without locality is different. 



C. INTERNATA, p. 252, 41. This equals C ampla, p. 268, 72; and, as 

 the examples of C internata are placed in a wrong section, I think 

 the name ampla should be retained. 



C. NIGROVARTA, p. 253, 42= C. nigrovaria. Walker. The " var. /3 " is 

 a very different species. 



C. Ramburii, p. 254, 43= C. Ramburii, Schnd. 



C. siGNATA, p. 254, 44. The example from Van Diemen's Land=C. 

 Ramburii ; the other is different, but not signata of Schneider. 



C. INNOTATA, p. 254, 45= C iwMofaf a, Walker. Antennar. artic. secund. 

 fuliginoso. 



C, TRANSVERSA, p. 255, 46= C. collaris, Schneider, var.?; appears to 

 differ only in the altogether black costal veinlets. 



C. ASPERSA, p. 256, 48= C. aspersa, Wesm. 



C. ABBREViATA, p. 257, 51 = 0. ? CevtahAy not~ abbrcviata, hut 



more closely allied to Zelleri ; the example is perhaps not European. 



C. LATiPENNis, p. 257, 54 = C. ypsilon, Fitch. 



C. CHLOROPHANA, p. 259, 55= C. transmarina, Hagen, teste Hagen. 

 There are probably two species intermixed ; but it belongs to a group 

 in which the differences seem to depend so much upon the presence 

 or absence of one or other of the complicated markings of the head, 

 and are perhaps only accidental, that I decline to give any positive 

 opinion on the examples mentioned by Mr. Walker. 



