221 



deer populations, and indicate that current and future human demand for deer will 

 not be met near many southeast communities. 



I use deer here only as an example, because it is the species we probably know the 

 most about. There are similar problems with, other species, like brown bears, which 

 will be affected by increased human presence as roads and logging camps are 

 extended into previously remote wilderness areas. Of all the wildlife species on the 

 Tongass, there are only a few whose habitat relationships we understand well, and 

 many whose habitat needs are not understood at all. It is highly unlikely that the 

 level of development proposed for the Tongass can take place without adversely 

 affecting many species that have evolved in, and are adapted to, this unique old- 

 growth environment. 



In conclusion, the old-growth forest of southeast Alaska supports a unique and still 

 largely pristine fauna. Future wildlife diversity and abundance on the Tongass will 

 depend on the extent to which the old-growth forest is protected- a protection that 

 does not appear possible imder the existing timber supply mandates of ANILCA. 

 Reform legislation is needed which grants fish, wildlife and recreation resources the 

 level of protection the public desires and deserves. 



