674 MR. A. G. BUTLER ON W.'AFRICAN LtPIDOPTERA. [Nov. 15, 



54. Tagiades brigida, var. 



Antigonus brigida, Plotz, Stett. ent. Zeit. 1879, p. 361. n. 32. 



But for the fact that the type of this species was from the 

 Cameroons, coupled with the remark " Diese Art sieht THchoneura, 

 Feld., ahrilich," I should certainly have failed to identify it ; the 

 description, " Hind wings above with broad straw- or orange-yellow 

 borders," hardly represents an insect in which more than half the 

 hind wing is bright orange ; nor does the statement that there are 

 "six hyahne white points " in the front wings answer to a specimen 

 with ten. However, I am unwilling to risk describing as new a 

 species which may be subject to variation and therefore already 

 described as above, or which may have been incorrectly described. 



55. Ceratrichia argyrosticta ? 



Apaustus argyrosticta, Plotz, Stett. ent. Zeit. 1879, p. 358. 

 n. 22. 



One example so nearly approaching the description of the above 

 that I think it can hardly be distinct. 



HETEROCERA. 



56. PSEUDOPONTIA PARADOXA. 



Globiceps paradoxa, Felder, Pet, Nouv. Ent. n. 8 (1869). 

 Oonophlebia paradoxa, Felder, I. c. n. 24, p. 95, fig. (1870), 

 Pseudopontia calabarica, Plotz, Stett. ent. Zeit. 1870, p. 348 

 pi. 2. figs. 1 a-f. 



I cannot understand why this insect has been referred to the 

 Butterflies ; the structure of the antennae and the neuration are 

 altogether pecuHar. In my opinion the genus is more nearly related 

 to the Chalcosiid moths. 



57. Otroeda occidentis. 



Otroeda occidentis. Walker, Cat, Lep, Het. ii, p, 403, n. 2 (1854). 

 One male example, 



58. Chrysopoloma rudis. 



Lasiocampa rudis. Walker, Cat. Lep. Het. Suppl. ii. p. 561 

 (1865). 



59. Pitthea continua. 



Pitthea continua. Walker, Cat. Lep. Het. ii. p. 463. n. I (1854). 



60. Cyligramma latona. 



PJialcena-Noctua latona, Cramer, Pap. Exot. i. p. 20, pi. 13 B 

 (1779). 



61. Azazia rubricans. 



Ophiusa rubricans, Boisduval, Faune, Lep. Madag. p. 106. n. 11, 

 pi. 16. fig. 1. 



