1918.] The Rauzat-ut-Tahirin. 273 
to notice something extraordinary in the way of counting the 
folios. They proceed by tens, though they are consecutive ; 
thus after 743 the next page is numbered 753, the next 763, 
the next 773, and so on. Sind begins on 833, and the next page 
is numbered 843 instead of 834, and the next is 853 instead of 
; se oO t 1s 
then Kashmir follows (fasl 3) on folio 863’. Then, Gujarat 
he Rauzat has in Qism V an account of the Lodi kings 
of India, and it has lives of Babur and Humayun. 
he only thing new in Tahir’s account of Babur is that he 
tells us the scene of Babur’s exploit in running along the ram- 
deg of a fort, carrying a man under each armpit. ‘Tahir says 
that this was in the Kabul Fort. Nizamu-d-din also tells this 
te na bar kangar-hai gala‘ jasta midawidand). The Raugat 
of also to say that ‘Abdu-r-Rahim made the translation, not 
S Own motion, but in consequence of orders from 4 
Tab. The life of Humayin is fuller than that in Nizamu-d-din's 
Rit Akbari, and in one place it contradicts both him and 
oO f azl. The latter two writers say that Tardi Beg refused 
urnish a horse for Miriam Makani (he had done so once be- 
