300 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. [NS., XIV, 
faxed TAN | 
The Conclusive Definition of Invariable Concomitance. 
Invariable concomitance is the co-presence of the middle 
term with the major term which is not qualified by the nature 
of the counterpart of that absolute non-existence which abides 
in the same locus with the middle term, but abides in a different 
locus in respect of the counterpart, e.g. 
The hill is full of fire, 
because it is full of smoke. 
Diagram IV. Diagram V. 
the major term, and the major term is not the counterpart 0 
that non-existence which abides in the same locus with the 
middle term. Looking at diagram V we find that there is ¢ 
eincant: of the knowable with the nameable which is not qual 
ed by the nature of a pot (though the pot is qualified by the 
nature of the nameable), and the absolute non-existence, W es 
counterpart is the pot, abides in the same locus with the kne 
able, but in a different locus in respect of the pot. : 
STATATHTA: | 
A Non-existence of the General Form. 
tae : ye 
_ _ Some say that even the conclusive definition given eer 
is defective Inasmuch as in going to establish the inves 
concomitance of smoke with fire we notice that fires are ™ 
A 
