348 Journal of the Asiatic Socrety of Bengal. [N.S., XIV, 
of Pathri or of Ambajogai or the river Manjra. We may there- 
fore take it as reasonably certain that the Dharir of the coins is 
the place of that name in Bhir District, Haidarabad State. 
(Imp. Gaz. Atlas, Plate 40, B2.) 
The College, Junacadh. S. H. Hop1vata. 
20th October, 1916. 
(2) Gapnarat (?) [GADHAKOT]. 
The Nagpar Museum contains two Rupees of Ahmad Shah 
to which Mr. Nelson Wright first drew attention in Num. Sup. 
XIII. “These coins are Mahratta-struck. They resemble in 
execution the Katak coins on pp. 248-250 of 1.M.C. IIL, 1908. 
What their mint is I am not able to conjecture.” (Loe. cil. 
242.) The year is represented by the number e% on both, and 
one of them has an arrow-head to the left of the mint-name, 
which Mr. Wright thought was wyboS on the larger coin, and | 
SU on the smaller. aoe 
May I beg leave to offer for the consideration of Numis- a 
matists a suggestion in reference to these puzzling arathi ie 
issues? It is that the name isw,Slao$( or @,Sle,$). The third 
letter is not a ‘niin’ but a ‘ha.’ The fifth is a of which beg 
been cut off from the larger coin, but is clearly visible on the : 
smaller. The latter has in its turn lost the first two ii ae 
S$ or of, gn 
The place is not at all difficult to identify. It is the Garhi 
own in t 
miles from Saugor on the Damoh road.” It has an old fort 
which must formerly have been of great strength, and was™ 
by the rebels, and stormed by Sir Hugh Rose in 1858. “1” — 
miles from the town is an old tower, which formed part of 
summer palace of a Bundela King and is said to have, e 
constructed in order that both Saugor and Damoh might ae 
visible from its summit.” (XII. 161.) ‘ Gurrahkota’ Rupees 
included by Prinsep (Useful Tables, Ed. 1834, p. 44) in bis 
of silver coins, and he states that they were ‘ deba oe 
sahy. eee 
t may not perhaps be su us to add that Garhas® 
is an altogether different place from Gadha. near Jabalpit © 
which the Balanagar Gadha coins of Shah ‘Alam II have b=? — 
with good reason, assigned. ett 
_ As for the figures +4. they are probably a mis-stamP br 
0.€. [ ll | 65 A.H. They can not stand for the a regnal Me: : 
The College, Junagadh. s. H. Hoprval’: 
10th March,1917. — es 
