Persian Manuscripts. . CCCXXXV 
is most valuable and of great historical interest. The auto- 
graphs of the king sufficiently prove the genuineness of the 
king’s handwriting. 
Written in good Ta‘liq. Not dated. 
Beg. :— 2! SOA Der SfO<} 
(Mata Pershad, Lucknow.) 
cob tyS Whly Gale Gy Bry! Ome! dal} 
LayIg rst cams Kas Cg g a OSL ss tle 
cen yt! pute ens Lb Jp Bato 95 
lays le Slama (gS 52 gyro yl aS 
thes logs aixi,3 ot) tlaahs aso wlhle s¥5.J Colla} ol! aif 
gt Te cere tre dw lacy yi FA ees? 
; Another note y the same king is on Hees gi ‘pscincacyet Diwan-i-Hafiz 
" 0.P. Library, (Bavkinect Vol. I, No. 153, 
tes deme bey Byole ‘la wii yo - od ce Le katye wis 
SAbltt 1y 9 Petra] Come perp die csdles she ets! galls is 
© BLEbS ossue Ulble see! Gallaur ... obf yore 
fine 7 the Juable 
possession of Sayyid Mahmiid of Merat a very va 
cee MS peeps Kulliyati-i- (Muhammad) Quli Qutb Shah (4.4. 989 
sre re wo yRivo lat were” gic aay rales lad lly 
as 
‘ai > doo pled 83 yo 2 gle wb Sf dos cgi ce 
ae s? cet YY = Cope yore ease: ua} sn yi 
Meabs 4 wo wlbls 4Y50) ee dant} aif - slo8¥l we all) ye 
- pling Laas las sit aals 
16 of the librarian ‘Abd-Allah Qutb Shah (4.#. 1035-1083 = .p. 
ns pe ps Sulta an of = poate also written on the above-said 
5th Su lta 
wos wl shes yt Cael Pe as sh.) bs gl doo ols 
OF ye ElsuliS UL ig olf yraa yo Shalt qed alli one Sipe! 3! 
ini Said fly-] ble, a the re- 
ma y-leaf b ar 
Ms fro, one ia thereat scitha Mehammwl aute Shah and the 
ultan “Abd Allah Qutb Shah, (For “the Mo brief accounts of the 
y 
meibag Sultans see Tarikh ‘Aziz-i-Deccan, Abdal-Aziz (Urdu), 
