46 N. Journal of the Astatic Society of Bengal. {N.S., XIX, 
or Vincent Smith’s, though it belongs to the circular ‘ Bull 
type. 
(8) Obverse.—Malava only, across the centre. Reverse.— 
Humped bull facing left. Somewhat similar to No 
(9) Obverse.—Palm-branch with Malava on one side and 
Na Jaya on the other. Reverse. — Animal facing right in dotted 
border. This js possibly the same as No 28 or 30 in Vincent 
Smith’s Catalogue. 
(10) Obverse.—Malava; NaJaya. Reverse.—Humped bull 
facing left, recumbent. Rectangular shape: can find no 
parallel to this in Vincent Smith’s Catalogue, though it is 
somewhat similar to No. 37. 
1) Obverse.—Malava only in the centre of the coin. 
Reverse.—Bull facing left. I can find no exact parallel to this 
Possibly same as 12456 of Rodgers’ Catalogue. 
(12) Obverse.—Ma@lava sujaya. Reverse.—Humped bull 
facing right. This coin is fairly large and square. I can find 
no ae in the catalogues. The letters are fairly distinct 
am convinced et the first letter in the second line is 
not ‘na.’ I read ‘su’ which gives good sense. The inscrip- 
tion then reads ‘ The well- Ee tite Malava.”’ 
13) Obverse.—Ma@lava inincuse square. Reverse.—Animal 
facing left. This Panes is See dviead: in shape, I can find no 
exact parallel to i 
(14) Obverse. ae and tree. The part obscured is 
probably ‘na jaya. > Reverse.—Lion facing left. Probably 
similar to No. 28 in Vincent Smith’s Catalogue. 
(15) Obverse.—Malava ; Na Jaya ; very faint. Reverse.— 
Lion facing right. This coin does not appear to resemble any 
of the ‘ Lion type’ coins in Vincent Smith’s Catalogue. 
(16) Obverse.—Maiaya or Malava in bold letters ae 
the middle. The last letter is very badly formed if i 
meant for a ‘va.’ It looks very much like a ‘cha. er- 
haps we should read Malacha. I see in ee Catalogue 
a coin of about the same size on which he reads Mapacha 
{t is possible shat this is the same coin. The middle Netter 
however looks to me more like a ‘la’ as the second stroke 
is rae than the first. On the whole I am inclined to think 
Vincent Smith’s Catalogue. In that coin too the middle letter — 
looks to me more like a ‘la.’ If Malaya is the correct 
reading, this coin should be placed among the earlier coins. 
It is certainly like them in construction 
(17) Obverse.—Malava in centre Reverse.—E lephant. : 
can find no parallel to this coin. It is in fairly good con- 
