a mee 
ay mn 
1923. ] Numismatic Supplement No. XX XVII. N. 47 
dition, and by the formation of the letters and general appear- 
ance I judge it to be one of the later types 
(18) Obverse.— Malava only. Reverse. = Delacell 
(19) Ditto 
(20) Malava on top and traces of ya below. Reverse.— 

(21) Obverse.—Malava and tree. Reverse. —Defaced. 
(22) Obverse.—Tree and ?—jaya. Reverse.—Defaced. 
(28) Obverse.—Mala—? (va). Reverse.—Tree in railing. 
(24) Obverse.—Tree in railing on left: right, letters ob- 
cured. Reverse.—Animal in dotted border. I can find no 
east to this in the catalogues. 
(25) Obverse.—Tree with traces of inscription on each 
side. Reverse. wet vase in dotted border. Similar in 
type to Nos. 14-22 in Vincent Smith’s Catalogue, and Nos. 
12426-12429 ae Goanee Catalogue 
(26) Obverse—Tree and legend jaya.  Reverse.—I!n- 
distinct. Possibly a figure between two sacraficial posts in a 
dotted square. I cannot find anything with a similar reverse 
to zont in the catalogues. 
27) Obverse.— Mala—? (va) Reverse.—Vase with handles. 
There appears to be nothing exactly like this in the catalogues. 
(28) Legend in two lines somewhat obscure. This is 
possibly the same as No. 12 in Vincent Smith’s Catalogue, 
ie,, he Obverse.—Malava and jaya. Reverse-—Lota in dotted 
cire 

29) Obverse —Ujjain symbol. Reverse —Obscure mark- 
ings on one edge, one of which resotn bial saver tional sign 
for a lotus flower. 
0) Open lotus flower on one side. Other side defaced. 
Possibly the same as No. 12425 in Rodgers’. 
(31) Obverse.—Malava. Reverse.—Lotus flower. 
30th December, 1921. R. O. Dowgtas. 
238. Notes ON THE COINAGE OF TIPPERA. 

Rajadhara, 1508 S. Y at rd 1522 8. 
Fi Fig 
