1923.] More on the Sources of Jami’s Nafahat. 303 
Ne y2 Bde) Cg pig aS Bde) CsenS yee SD sUY,0 aS Mode yt Go 
S$ mentioned above, it seems probable that Jami could do 
As 
little with Iqbal’s work beyond basing on it the biography of 
‘Alau’d- Daula and a shail other saints. He also few as in the 
hae as to their origin in Jami’s he because the letters 
are a ane as an independent pamphlet, as in the 
ae . 
Smt I have to add that in his preface to the 
Najahan’ Jami has inciuded several passages from a Persian 
translation of Shihabu’d-Din ‘Umar psenapee s ‘Awarifu'l- 
ma‘arif, as already identified by W. Pertsch® The Persian 
version in question was prepared by ‘Tze0'd- Din Mahmad b. 
‘Ali al-Kashant (d. 735 A.H. / 1334-1335 A.D.), under the title 
Misbahw'l-hidayat wa mijtahw’ 1- -kilayat. The extracts are taken 
from the first and the third babs.° 
May, 1924, Calcutia. 

Yusuf Husayni, oe Gistidiraz i 825 A.D. / 1422 A.H. ) ; eat 
of the same opinion. In one of his letters he calls the wo Rim 
‘Attar and Ibn ‘Arabi nonsense, and — selves the evil Some a iolend 
( Sxl ae, ty pln! ene -. Oa ), see Maktibat-t-Gisidiraz, 
mie 
MS. o doi Society of Bae E 189, £. 19 (deseribed in the Cata- 
fosue tod No. 1232). 
\ ay Neem 
8-567. Kaméalu’d-Din (or Jamalu’d-Din) ‘Abdu'r- ag 
Kashi, ge epee of many works on — pes sm, died in 730 os H. _ oar 
419. Concerning the t@if-i-Ashrafi s 
article on yaur sauthorities, p 401, pe the Catalogue of ae he. Society's 8 
Persian MSS., No 1214 (pp. 577-581). 
+ H. Ethé’s oases No. bl. 
5 OW. give it Die Handschriften Verzeichnisse der K. Bib = 
Berlin, vol. IV, Verzeichniss der Persischen Hanaschriften, 1888, p. 290, 
ef, ope 6, India Office Catalogue, No. 1837. 
Naja hat, pp. 5, 7, 17-1 
ee 
ee ee Se OS 
