462 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. (July, 1911, 
Page 54, last line. For c'y: read ,,/y, that is, Ba Wali-al- 
Haqq ; the tashdid has been wrongly made into the dots of ata, 
Page 60,1.14. For osin read ox) istid. Compare istada 
just above. The passage means, ‘‘ Dont you stand.’’ 
Page 64, 1.8. Though Man Sen agrees with original, it 
should be Man Singh. 
Page 75, last line. sys!) e.clea should apparently be | pu} goles 
Page 83,1. 3. For (yds jlee read ure yee. The mistake 
is important for it makes aremark of A. T.’s unintelligible. 
What he says is that he was convinced that the siege of 
Ahmadabad by the rebels would be unsuccessful, for there were 
four discordant parties among the besiegers, viz. Ist, [khtiyaru-l- 
Mulk and all the Gujaratis; 2nd, the Mirzas (Moghuls); 3rd, the 
Afghans; 4th the Abyssinians. 
Page 83, 1.18. For sgl read gyo5l. Also delete word 
after dashtand. 
Page 34, 1.3. For Qu,5 read wy: 
Page 84, 611. from foot. Is an important passage as it gives 
us the name of ‘Umar Khan Lodi the father of the famous 
Daulat Khan whom A. T, calls the Vakil of ‘Aziz Koka. See 
Blochmann 502, ‘Umar Khan then was the grandfather of 
the still more famous Khan Jahan Lodi of Jahangir and Shah 
Jahan’s time. 
Page 99, top line. For 94 read qr. 
Page 99,1, 3. For oii read osiS, 
Page 99,1.10. For if read oil, 
Page 103, 1.6. For as! read &!. 
Page 108, last line. Apparently the word basababahar is, 
as suggested by Dr. Ross, a mistake for basiha ‘‘ woman.” 
ADDENDA. 
centuries in which, at p. 11, a distinction is drawn between the 
two Portuguese words barca and barcha. The latter is clearly 
Page 13,1. 18—eite. This word has been correctly copied, 
and is, I think, right. It means, apparently, that the man 
