484 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. {August, 1911, 
The next words are vapa-ttrayamm apasya, the ¢ being doubled 
with the r as is generally done here and in the other grants, and 
a superfluous anusvara being wrongly placed over the ya. The 
remaining letters are not vyaghracora koyacchi patacca bhuhsima 
but vyaghra-corako yac chesam tac catuh-stma-; the vawel over 
the cch is e and not 7; the next letter is a badly formed sa and 
not pa, for p has no bar at the top of its right limb; and over 
this sa is an anusvara which is slightly displaced to the left 
because the aksara Jpya in the preceding line prevents its 
being placed in its proper position. What he reads as bhu is 
tu formed rather carelessly, for the left limb has the curve 
that ¢ always has in this inscription (see for instance the ¢ in 
tac ca immediately preceding), whereas that limb in DA is 
always curved the other way (see remarks above on 1. 14). 
His conjecture therefore about patacca (p. 434) is unnecessary. 
} The reading is Supratika-svaminah, and not 
Supratika-svaminah, though this is probably a printer’s error. 
Line 19. He reads jogika, but the word is jotika for the 
second letter has not the bar at the bottom of its left limb 
the ¢ a line which is evidently a virama. At the end the plate 
shows a single bar clearly, so that a double one has not to be 
supplied. 
Line 22. The first word is not sva-datlam but sva-dalam, 
as the ¢ is not double ; this is an error of course. His read 
vasundharam should be vasiindharam, for the s has not only its 
right limb extended downwards to denote u, as in Supraiika 
(ll. 5 and 17), but also a curve added thereto which makes the 
long aw. This of course is another error. The reading 8 
Line 23. The reading is eyati the 
‘ s pacyate and not pacy??, | 
vowel mark being ¢ rather than 7. He reads samvat, but the 
