766 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. [December, 1911. 
by that victory three hundred and odd elephants fell into his. 
hand. —Raverty’s translation, p. 470. 
(2) In the list of ‘‘ Victories, Successes and Holy-wars,”” 
We ligee. 5 ok ai Chand of Banaras, Banaras, Kinnauj, 
Kalinjar, territory of Awadh, Malwa, Adwand Bihar, Lakha- 
nawati, Sita, wa —p 49] 
(3) The only mention of the war with Kanauj in the 
account of the events of the rule of Sultan Qutb-ud-din, Ibak, 
consists of: <* .... and, in the year 590 H., Kutb-ud-din 
proceeded, at the august stirrup of the victorious Sultan, along 
with the Sipah-Salar, ‘Izz-ud-din, Husain, son of Kharmil, both 
of them being the leaders of the van of the army, and fell 
upon the Rae of Banaras, Jai-Chand, on the confines of 
Chandwal and overthrew him.”’ p. 516 
o- 
So we find that the Taj-ul-Ma’asir does not contain even - 
the name of Kanauj. In the Tabaqat-i-Nasiri, Sultan Muham- 
to the East of the Sone. Adwand Bihar is the same as 
Uddandapura-Vihara as we find in one of the inscriptions of 
Strapala II of the Pala dynasty of Bengal.! It is also the 
mi 
take. _ Later on, in the account of Shamsi victories, i.e. the 
victories of Sultan Shams-ud-din Altamsh, we find the reduc- 
tion of Kanauj expressly mentioned :— 
EEE OR subjugation of Lakhanawati “— : 
ts 
territory, taking of Kinnauj-i-Sher-garh jmir, 
ar ; 
ae eae verty was led to remark: “ the greater num- 
1 See above, vol. iv, p- 109, pl. vii. 
