Vol. VIII, No. 3.] The Atapura Inscription. 65 
LV.S.] 
(R. G., vol. II, A., p. 14.) 
The author of the Rajputana Gazetteer, Mr. Bhandarkar 
and Pandit Ojhaji have taken a very favourable view of the 
importance of this transcript of the alleged epigraph. The 
first twenty names of the lists of chiefs of Mewar of these three 
scholars are said to be in perfect accordance with this tran- 
script. And as regards its importance Mr. Bhandarkar says :— 
‘‘The importance, however, of this inscription chiefly 
consists in giving us reliable information regarding the earlier 
part of the dynastic list. No less than three such lists had 
gives a full dynastic list.!’’ : 
Besides, this transcript in the Anandapura theory 1s con- 
sidered as its most reliable fundamental proof. Because it 
supports satisfactorily its aim, that Guhila was a Nagara 
Brahmana and he migrated from Anandapura. 
But nobody has yet made a critical examination of the 
w we relate the result of our critical examination for 
) 
the informati i ian readers :— 
rmation of our antiquar Se know ame 
original stone is, at present, not available for examination. It 
fn aru out the original epigraph, but we all unfortuna 
ailed to obtain it. 
_ B. Thereafter, Kaviraj, the head of the department of 
History, endeavoured: ‘his Bed 
Possession of his Pandit Gyanji Jati of Mandal eee tek 
time, he fortunately got a rough copy © interes On cer of 
Bhilwara. This copy of the transcript wa 
