Vol. VIII, No. 3.] The Atapura Inscription. 75 
[N.S.] 
(B. I., pages 13 and 21.) 
Ill. His (Bapa’s) son by name Guhila became a king, he 
ruled over the earth with virtue of high spirit like Vishnu 
(Madhujit), from whom the kings of the Guhila family were 
called of the Guhila caste. 
(Chitorgadh Inscription). 
And the fourth was the posthumous son of Siladitya, the 
last king of Vallabhi, whose another name, according to 
Khyatis, was Keshavaditya (II). Accordingly, the Guhadatta 
or Guhila of the Atapura inscription is undoubtedly the 
Guhila III, son of Bapa. Because, the writer of this epigraph, 
exception of those ones only which are more in this earlier 
epigraph (see the comparative list of chiefs of Mewar appended 
to this paper as marked E). Moreover, it is not surprising - 
i a 
that Mallata or Mattata’s name is left out in the Achalgadh 
epigraph, though its writer and that of the Chitorgadh one is 
the very same Pandit, a Nagar Brahmana of our caste (see 
Appendix E). From this, it appears that the writer of every 
inscription has mentioned as many names only as he could know 
or ascertain, when he composed the inscription—so is the case 
of this Atapura inscription even, as it is plainly said in it— 
awa, i.e. in his (Guhadatta’s) lineage so and so princes were, 
and not definitely that Guhadatta’s son was Bhoja and so on. 
Therefore, it can be safely concluded, that the list of chiefs of 
every inscription before us is incomplete. And the reason 
TEXT. 
wetTeatea: quat quifaa: wafaaate | 
aaraat gata quam saaeret yfese sm | vt 
aguit yfeae caaaateaT: ee | 
ama AIRY Bast wi GAAd aLTy || 
