348 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. [September, 1912.] 
a.p.). Danauja was the Raya of Sonarga with whom Bulban 
made a treaty when he pursued the rebellious Governor of 
rulers of Bengal between a.D. 760 and 770. So Adisura brought 
the Brahmanas not in the 1lth century but in the 8th. The 
bringing of Brahmanas in Bengal was not a single and isolated 
fact of Brahminising an Indian province. It was in fact one 
court poet of Yasovarina Deva, who sent Brahmanas to Bengal, 
was a disciple of Kumarila. So the story of Adisira’s bringing 
the Brahmanas from Kanouj was neither silly nor invented by 
modern Radhiyas and Varendras derive their names. In Bal- 
lala’s time a census of these Brahmanas resident within bis 
dominions was taken and they numbered 800 families. 
The evidence of the Bhakti Bhagavata Mahakavya by 
Jivadevacarya, first noticed by me in my Report on the search 
of Sanskrit manuscripts for the years 1901—1906, is besides 
Babu Manomohana Cakravarti’s purpose, because Bhavadeva 
mentioned therein belonged to the Vatsa Gotra and was a 
Udiya Brahmana, while Bhavadeva the author, the temple- 
builder and the minister to Harivarma, belonged to Savarna 
Gotra and was a Radhiya Brahmana. They cannot at all be 
one and the same person. 
LO LN LVL IPO NL LONI NA 
