Vol. VI, No. 4.] Numismatic Supplement. 239 



[N.8.] 



Reverse. 



Li 



A 



I 



^Uf ^ iv^a ^*jla> 



-c 



omission 



unfortunately 



with the one described and figured in Numismatic Supplement 

 II , article 1 5. The arrangement of the reverse is the same and 



there are similar collections 



curves 



cr 



of ^i^J^ and the ^ of 



That coin was of Farrukhsiyar. The mint is new for 

 Jahandar. 



2. M. MUHAMMAD SHAH. 



Mint — Satara. 



Date — A.H. 1L Regnal year obliterated. 



Obverse.— Usual inscription. Date to right of top line. 



Reverse. 



cr> 



U 



w> 1 



m m 



This is an addition to the list of Mughal min$s. Is the 

 Satara of this coin the well-known town in the Bombay Presi- 

 dency, which bears the same name but is apparently spelt 

 Satara (see Imperial Gazetteer) ? I have been unable to identi- 

 fy it with any other place. 



3. JR. MUHAMMAD SHAH. 



Mint — Balwantnagar. 



Date— A.H. 115 x Regnal year, 28. 



Obverse. — Usual inscription. Date to right of top line. 



Reverse. — Usual arrangement. Mint name in bottom 



line. 



In Mr. Bum's list of Mughal mints (J.A.S.B.. Vol. LXX1I1, 

 Part I, No. 2, 1904) is given a coin from my cabinet of this 

 mint struck in the reign of Ahmad Shah. This coin wa§ 



